HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

throwaway4715

no profile record

comments

throwaway4715
·6 năm trước·discuss
The ones that want that already do.
throwaway4715
·6 năm trước·discuss
How does one ensure "stability" without getting involved in politics?
throwaway4715
·6 năm trước·discuss
Multiple things can be true. 1) It was incredibly stupid for anyone to use suppressing unions as an example. 2) Employers should have control over the content on their internal systems (people get fired for things they say over email/Slack/etc. all the time). 3) This headline is some serious click bait.
throwaway4715
·6 năm trước·discuss
I don't think whether they have changed affects their ability to buy Giphy.

Your CCPA point is interesting though. However my guess is the CCPA is unlikely to be used in that way as it would affect nearly every acquisition in every industry.
throwaway4715
·6 năm trước·discuss
Yeah, but the IG founders didn't want to put ads on the product at all. It was not a sustainable business while in their control.
throwaway4715
·6 năm trước·discuss
That interview was bad. They're trying to make you feel bad for the Instagram founders because they were too stupid to realize that after you _sell_ your company you don't own it anymore. Also, per that interview, Instagram only became sustainable under Facebook.

Hard to feel bad about it.
throwaway4715
·6 năm trước·discuss
Are you saying that Facebook shouldn't be allowed to own any product that can be shared on a competitors platform? Seems kinda ridiculous.
throwaway4715
·6 năm trước·discuss
Acquisition seems to make sense then. Facebook can fix search easily with their tech and Giphy already has the reach.