HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

varjag

16,005 karmajoined 17 năm trước
http://funcall.org

Submissions

The fall of the theorem economy

davidbessis.substack.com
285 points·by varjag·9 ngày trước·122 comments

Human Bottlenecks

borretti.me
5 points·by varjag·2 tháng trước·0 comments

Mine, an IDE for Coalton and Common Lisp

coalton-lang.github.io
138 points·by varjag·3 tháng trước·56 comments

Whistler: Live eBPF Programming from the Common Lisp REPL

atgreen.github.io
134 points·by varjag·4 tháng trước·18 comments

A Preview of Coalton 0.2

coalton-lang.github.io
50 points·by varjag·4 tháng trước·2 comments

Cl-kawa: Scheme on Java on Common Lisp

github.com
90 points·by varjag·5 tháng trước·24 comments

PCB Rework and Repair Guide [pdf]

intertronics.co.uk
168 points·by varjag·5 tháng trước·48 comments

Who has the lowest Erdos-Bacon-Epstein number?

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
4 points·by varjag·5 tháng trước·0 comments

Letting Claude play text adventures

borretti.me
154 points·by varjag·6 tháng trước·62 comments

There Is No New Aesthetics

borretti.me
4 points·by varjag·6 tháng trước·0 comments

Vintage Computing Christmas Challenge

logiker.com
4 points·by varjag·7 tháng trước·0 comments

Paged Out

pagedout.institute
599 points·by varjag·7 tháng trước·64 comments

Mizar Language

mizar.uwb.edu.pl
4 points·by varjag·8 tháng trước·4 comments

Tetris Effect

en.wikipedia.org
4 points·by varjag·8 tháng trước·0 comments

Vibecoding a Cyberpunk 3D GUI for System Commissioning

blog.funcall.org
1 points·by varjag·9 tháng trước·0 comments

Unit Testing in Coders at Work

gigamonkeys.wordpress.com
3 points·by varjag·10 tháng trước·1 comments

comments

varjag
·7 giờ trước·discuss
Let me simplify it for the sake of argument. Imagine I am unable to follow a middle school proof of Pythagoras. How does it matter if I trust anyone beyond that? What possible contribution can I build on top of that?
varjag
·7 giờ trước·discuss
You can literally see the analog video links in countless thousands of published recordings. Nobody really does the hopping with analog video.
varjag
·8 giờ trước·discuss
How come? It plainly negates the "easy" part. It's not easy at all, you need to scale your signal path to the magnitude of power. I.e. the expensive part.
varjag
·8 giờ trước·discuss
FPV drones in the Russian war are generally pretty dumb devices, there's usually no frequency hopping involved to begin with. They have a lot more in common with baby monitors than with modern military comms.
varjag
·8 giờ trước·discuss
Well we're literally discussing a human readable machine generated proof here yet you don't seem happy with that.
varjag
·8 giờ trước·discuss
I didn't say they have no value. Just limited value. A novel readable proof that expands the horizons of human insight is certainly more valuable than a megabyte sized trychnobezoar of machine generated predicates.
varjag
·8 giờ trước·discuss
Yes. That makes it fat, expensive and vulnerable target. There are videos of them being blown up regularly.
varjag
·8 giờ trước·discuss
How does it matter if it Lean verified or a human verified proof if you comprehend neither?

There can't be too many people working in that corner of graph theory, and I expect the result to them being eminently straightforward.
varjag
·8 giờ trước·discuss
Human unreadable proofs have only limited value.
varjag
·8 giờ trước·discuss
It's not a long proof (it's not in Lean after all) so easy enough to comb through for a domain expert.
varjag
·8 giờ trước·discuss
Jamming broadband is a lot more energy expense than frequency hopping. Orders of magnitude.
varjag
·8 giờ trước·discuss
You could try solving that in Lean perhaps
varjag
·9 giờ trước·discuss
…and thank God it's not Lean.
varjag
·3 ngày trước·discuss
What happens in countries with no rule of law is rule of power hierarchies. A regional party boss would have his trusted deputes running things, who have their underlings, they underlings have their preferred business partners (police chiefs, businessmen, prosecutors, control authorities) and so on. A bribe at any level is always redistributed upwards.

Sometimes the big guy falls out of favor with bigger guys, and then the whole structure is up for grabs. The whole vertical is massacred (sometimes literally) while new people take over from the top down. Often what's visible happens a few degrees removed from the actual cause.

There's understanding among the ruling class and much of the populace that it's just How Things are Done. But moments like that give you public trials with executions that make some naïve Westerners clap.
varjag
·4 ngày trước·discuss
What did you use for the simulation part?
varjag
·6 ngày trước·discuss
I have in fact masters in SE and three decades experience of commercial programming. Loved every minute of it (well except the burnout episode) and still do my hobby projects. So I would say no, you are wrong. The models decimate not just the coding (the best and the most fun part of development) but all the pseudo-engineering roles like architects or product managers too. Simply because there's less need for communication in the team as the surface of work for each dev is now quite enormous.
varjag
·6 ngày trước·discuss
It's fine for your pet projects. But for most of professional programming it's no longer feasible as you'll be at a small fraction of your machine assisted performance.
varjag
·9 ngày trước·discuss
You know how I read new papers back in 1994? By going to the library, finding one in bi-annual publication list and requesting it through the University system. And it better be necessary because the uni had to pay both the catalogue and each reprint of an article. The access is most certainly easier today.
varjag
·9 ngày trước·discuss
Engineering is used fairly loosely these days but I insist engineering ends where you have to prove theorems.
varjag
·10 ngày trước·discuss
Normally export controls once introduced last years to decades.