HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

willbw

no profile record

comments

willbw
·năm ngoái·discuss
I think you might be imposing an America-centric view on the BBC. I doubt that was the intention.
willbw
·2 năm trước·discuss
I don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone accuse anything Apple made of being garish.
willbw
·3 năm trước·discuss
I think operating system is much more common of a term than OpenSearch?
willbw
·3 năm trước·discuss
This doesn't contribute to the discussion. Nor make sense?
willbw
·3 năm trước·discuss
I agree, no examples means I have to download and try it out - no thanks .
willbw
·3 năm trước·discuss
Effective Java by Joshua Bloch is fantastic for covering up to Java 9. There have been incremental updates since then but this book will get you 95% of the way, and it is very well written.
willbw
·3 năm trước·discuss
Is this beat-poet anti-Microsoft thing a character or how you are in real life?
willbw
·5 năm trước·discuss
I suppose it all depends on the abstractions you make and how well those abstractions hold in the real world. Humans of course make abstractions but many of these are done subconsciously.

Simulating brick laying might be able to be done in a controlled environment, is it possible to make it low cost enough and accurate enough for all general purpose brick laying situations? Probably, given enough investment we could get closer. Is ironing out all the nuances cost effective? I don't know.

We can definitely simulate a driving environment but I given the recent struggles of self driving cars I don't think I would say that we are at the point where we've solved the problem of actually driving them in everyday situations.
willbw
·5 năm trước·discuss
I think it is different from people saying we couldn't automate chess or go. The difference is between a purely data domain, chess or go, where it can both be translated 1-1 into a computer simulation of the game AND the inputs are data.

I realise that you could define everything as data - laying a brick, you take the inputs of where to position the brick, etc. However I think we can make the distinction between chess where the data is "Pawn is on e4" and the much greater complexity of the real world where we are dealing with billions of atoms. Perhaps not everyone agrees with me.