HackerTrans
热门最新趋势评论往期问答秀出招聘

Graphon1

no profile record

评论

Graphon1
·9个月前·讨论
What are you using it for, primarily?
Graphon1
·10个月前·讨论
No love for caddyserver?
Graphon1
·10个月前·讨论
Tech Lead, not PM. (in my experience)
Graphon1
·10个月前·讨论
not a joke.

Also, the future you are referring to is... like... 6 weeks from now.
Graphon1
·10个月前·讨论
I don't know why we need a term like "Async AI programming." this is literally what you would do if you were a Tech Lead directing a team of other developers. You define what you want and hand it to one of your devs.

This is just being a TL. the agent is an assistant or a member of the team. I don't know why we need to call it "Async AI programming", unless we want to shy away from or obscure the idea that the agent is actually performing the job a human used to perform.
Graphon1
·10个月前·讨论
> is that it assumes you already know what you want at the start, and, implicitly, that what you want actually makes some real sense.

My experience is different. I find that AI-powered coding agents drop the barriers to experimentation drastically, so that ... yes if I don't know what I Want, I can go try things very easily, and learn. Exploration just got soooo much cheaper. Now that may be a different interaction that what is described in this blog post. The exploration may be a precursor to what is happening in this blog post. But once I'm done exploring I can define the problem and ask for solutions.

If it's DOA you'd better tell everyone who is currently doing this, that they're not really doing this.
Graphon1
·10个月前·讨论
Kerbernerd revealed.
Graphon1
·10个月前·讨论
> disabled RC4 where possible

I'm curious. Under what circumstances would it be _not_ possible to disable RC4?

Is this in case there is a Windows 98 machine running somewhere in the network?
Graphon1
·10个月前·讨论
do you know the name Luigi Mangione?
Graphon1
·10个月前·讨论
> even in Japan somebody could make some kind of battery ignited home-made shotgun and kill Shinzo Abe

ok let's try data instead of feels. Per Capita, what is the number of mass shootings per year in the USA, and in Japan. I did't know the answer but asked Gemini.

The most recent year for which there is data, apparently, is 2023, during which there were 604 mass shootings in the USA, and 1 in Japan. Given the respective population counts, the per-capita rate of mass shootings in the United States was about 225 times higher than in Japan.

Given that, are you confident that your observation that "one guy made a gun once in Japan" is a strong refutation of the idea that the US could reduce mass shootings by strengthening regulations?
Graphon1
·10个月前·讨论
We had no idea what we were dealing with. It was unprecedented. People were doing the best they could. All the anger didn't help.
Graphon1
·10个月前·讨论
It's not a prompt injection _in the MCP Server_. It's injection facilitated by the MCP server that pulls input from elsewhere, eg an email sent to your inbox, a webpage that the agent fetches, or in the comment on a pull request submitted to your repo. [1]

[1] https://www.thestack.technology/copilot-chat-left-vs-code-op...
Graphon1
·12个月前·讨论
> -all existing investors and vested employee/equity holders are paid out;

But the statement from Cognition was:

  >    100% of Windsurf employees will participate financially in this deal
  >    100% of Windsurf employees will have vesting cliffs waived for their work to date
  >    100% of Windsurf employees will receive fully accelerated vesting for their work to date
The details matter. "vesting cliffs waived" meaning what? Windsurf shares exchanged for Cognition shares? at what ratio?

"Participate financially" means what exactly? They could all get a coupon for a free doughnut, and that statement would be true.

I'm not saying the employees are getting nothing, or even a raw deal. I'm saying we have no idea if the deal is good for them, without details.

> theoretically the remaining company could pay accelerate vesting, then pay out the cash to their remaining employees, and then shut down, to give everyone the same exit as an acquisition, or better.

unlikely that will happen. More likely the investors and VCs will take the lion's share of the $2.5B, that is what they do. That is why they exist. And they'll distribute as thin a slice as possible to the employees.
Graphon1
·12个月前·讨论
> I think anthropic and OpenAI are both sufficiently differentiated that they would be profitable/extremely successful companies by all accounts if they stopped spending today.

Maybe. But that would probably be temporary. The market is sufficiently dynamic that any advantages they have right now, probably isn't stable defensible longer term. Hence the need to keep spending. But what do I know? I'm not a VC.