What is the difference between google blocking a search, and some one at google pretending to be an AI. Personally, I do think the President should be allowed censorship out of respect for the Title of Office. But then so should past Presidents. Which seems to show that Google has no respect and actively discredits its customer base. Judging by Microsoft Co-pilot AI performance, I feel a shake up of Google is over due. As the Meta/Google split has done nothing. In fact with the introduction of Android mobiles. The impartiality of a Telecommunications carrier has been legally breached! But I am not a lawyer, so only the evidence of past Telecommunications practises, exist to be examined and compared! (Remember when mobile phones had voice mail messages. Like "Please leave your your name and number, and the Presidents 'AI' will get back to you" De La Soul !)
Great article. I have been hitting on 'High School's levels including 8 dimensional , dual quaternion, Dirac's Eq. Algebra. On my website. Mainly as they give a view of the dynamics of non trivial unitary matrix expansions that can occur in such as Zeta Zero, element nuclei, prime numbers, energy levels. For light elements. For de located electrons in sync, the Markov chains are interesting, as they relate to cellular automata, the taking of limits for (relativity, electrons moving with charge potential).Having not done high school algebra, until latter years. I have learnt to not assume, a particular algebra fits all dynamic non trivial matrix process's. Ie quantum computing, long range sensors, gravity waves, pressurised plasma at phase, ECT. So great article as it shows a practical high school level of applied knowledge, that doesn't revolve around solely unitary matrices. In as much as its potential dynamic (linear expansion)evolved states ! To which the high school level of visualisation can become aware! (I just thought I'd add this on legal probabilities. There is a case involving a SASR trooper 'Schultz' that revolves around shooting a Mulha's spotter. In Australia magistrates seem to judge cases based on 4 dimensional probabilities. And this seems to tie in with Jeffery Epstein's management through cohesion of President Clinton's pattent attorney change from an solely engineer to a lawyer based pattent granting. Epstein's little girl problem wasn't solely sexual, but given stock market prediction dynamics, more like a dynamic non trivial unitary probability problem of visualising size. Something magistrates in Australia seem to have adopted in the determining of complex military cases.). Warren