amoe_

no profile record

·2个月前·讨论

The difference is that these rhetorical techniques need to be used with taste. LLMs just sprinkle them everywhere to try to make their copy sound good, even when it's completely inappropriate tone-wise. They don't make higher level judgements about when to employ specific features.

amoe_

·3个月前·讨论

> - Philosophy, really good and useful

I have had the opposite experience, philosophy questions tending to show the various chatbots at their most irrational and confabulatory.

amoe_

·3个月前·讨论

Completely agree. It's absolutely awful having software projects squatting on the names of great philosophers and artists. I appreciate that perhaps the author wanted to show their appreciation, but there are plenty of other equally communicative options.

amoe_

·4个月前·讨论

The problem for me is not services where the content is online, you can just avoid those, but cases where access to scarce real resources is controlled through online verification. E.g. renting recording studios, background checks for job applications, things like this. Often there is no route that does not go through a third-party verification service.

amoe_

·6个月前·讨论

Which particular LLM was that?

amoe_

·9个月前·讨论

If I'm already using Poetry and not facing any issues with it, is there any advantage to using uv?

amoe_

·10个月前·讨论

I actually like this and don't want them to be joined up.

评论