我是昆士兰人,没注意过这个词,只在电视上看过一个用猫鼬做动画的广告,除此之外,我不太喜欢在网上购买或预订东西,不过如果我看到它被贴在一次性定价活动可能会蔓延的东西上,我还是可以理解的......订阅的东西,没有。
fundamentally resolve legal issues stemming from any serious incident that plays out, fights, stabbings, abductions etc.
Either gives parents of less than obedient kids the necessary excuse to, by whatever reasonable means, to stop their children wasting the mornings, school time, afternoons and nights, on social media OR a necessary impetus on parents to ensure their kids are / know how to be safe online.
The algorithms that social media refused to remove from the last few years are reduced to being meaningless apart from being the same means to identify youngsters ... so instead of being referred to some other diet or BS area, the account can be flagged to be locked with a show cause.
There are those who see it as a means to an end to require real identity for any social media, landing eventually needing extra personal verification details - age, living address etc. There was already a camp which wanted [1] to bring in verification for social media accounts, especially after a prominent incident in the US involving a somewhat anonymous user ...
(iirc) the person the govt at the time 2021 early 2022 brought in to work on bringing ID required for social media use ... is the same who was asked / tasked to bring in the under 16 legislation.
Believe that just like google couldn't tell a completely obvious spam site back in the 10's, social media can't use those concerning or problematic algorithms to deduce an account in Australia might be a youngster.
Most phone plans in Australia require a form of identification which typically only adults have like a drivers licence, their own Australian medical card number, etc, so it's something parents themselves set up or crafty young kids work around it by gaining access to the relevant details.