the wide angle makes it look a lot further away from the rocket than they really were - The camera is about 440m away from the rocket.
The damage shown in the video appears to be entirely caused by debris while the article was suggesting possible property damage ("shattered glass and damaged foundations ... from a miscalculated sonic blast") to towns 8500m away - 20 times further
"In Port Isabel, a city about six miles northwest where at least one window shattered, residents were alarmed. " from [0] posted to HN [1]
I stand corrected - the warning article was pretty accurate
[0] https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/21/us/spacex-rocket-dust-tex...
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35651757