If a document is used to train an LLM, that means that an AI checker would be more likely to give a false positive that the document is written by AI?
I guess it depends on the AI checker.
I would think that that LLM, after generating the fragment "When in the course of.." would just be a bit more likely to generate "human" as the next word, yes?
Admittedly I don't have a tremendous amount of varied experience with AI-assisted coding, but I have used VSCode copilot quite a bit with Python and it has worked quite well for me. I am sometimes very surprised how well it figures out my intent.
I'm next planning on looking at Cursor and Claude Code, so the GH Copilot CLI preview caught my attention.
What exactly do you dislike about VSCode copilot compared to the competition?
I've followed SimonW for quite some time and bullshit/grifting is just NOT something he does.
On the contrary, I've learned a great deal from him and appreciate his contributions.