HackerTrans
热门最新趋势评论往期问答秀出招聘

functionmouse

837 声望加入于 8个月前

提交

City counsellors under fire for AI Orange Line map [video]

youtube.com
2 分·作者 functionmouse·13天前·0 评论

See Anthropic Orchestrate the Narrative

3 分·作者 functionmouse·26天前·0 评论

Federal Surveillance Tech Becomes Mandatory in New Cars by 2027

gadgetreview.com
79 分·作者 functionmouse·4个月前·48 评论

AI on Your Terms

firefox.com
3 分·作者 functionmouse·5个月前·0 评论

[untitled]

1 分·作者 functionmouse·8个月前·0 评论

评论

functionmouse
·19小时前·讨论
不够
functionmouse
·22小时前·讨论
因为作为一名读者,一袋袋的糖比一袋袋的混凝土更吸引我。
functionmouse
·前天·讨论
老实说,这应该接受所有字典匹配
functionmouse
·3天前·讨论
It's true; I also started reading the comments before clicking the article. Show of hands?
functionmouse
·3天前·讨论
I think we should only be recommending MIT Scheme. Everything else has got too much going on and can become distracting, for the purposes of education.
functionmouse
·5天前·讨论
if they fire everyone and stop spending money, only making money, their PnL ratio will be infinite!
functionmouse
·5天前·讨论
I've always wondered why they use belts when it seems helical gears would offer much more stable playback and better longevity. Is it just cost?
functionmouse
·5天前·讨论
It's almost certainly how all the button elements on your phone and computer currently work... Keyboard, homescreen, hamburger menus, links, you name it.
functionmouse
·6天前·讨论
I wish I could click the picture to pop out scale to full 1x
functionmouse
·6天前·讨论
Good Lord what is happening in there?

These screenshots look awesome. Definitely checking this one out. Thanks for this!
functionmouse
·6天前·讨论
> what about debouncing

activate button function on touch release instead of touch down?
functionmouse
·8天前·讨论
Yeah but you won't so it's not a big problem

We can't orchestrate our society around what someone "could" do

You could kill me with a rock easier than you could kill me with a drone
functionmouse
·8天前·讨论
B+
functionmouse
·8天前·讨论
ok

mp3 is near lossless
functionmouse
·8天前·讨论
the bull case for industrial AI looks a lot like turning the whole planet into paperclips
functionmouse
·9天前·讨论
it's gonna be so easy for them lol
functionmouse
·9天前·讨论
> theres a big difference between 99% quality and 30%.

sure

> if you treat it in a binary way where everything short of 100 falls into one "lossy" bucket you lose all the practical differences that make one encoding much better than another.

no; lossless is an inherently binary term. and I don't lose all the practical differences of better lossy encoders by understanding that; I'm not just going to start using mp3 96k because I have an understanding of lossless vs lossy encoders...

Lossless is an objectively binary term.
functionmouse
·9天前·讨论
Euthanasia is great. Bezo is against it because he profits immeasurably on deep human suffering.
functionmouse
·9天前·讨论
Actually, all of those things are considered "lossy".
functionmouse
·9天前·讨论
there is no such thing as "near lossless"