HackerTrans
热门最新趋势评论往期问答秀出招聘

gawkdev

1 声望加入于 2个月前
构建人工智能编码工具实时状态监控器 Gawk (https://gawk.dev)。每个数字都注明了出处。

提交

Show HN: Gawk CLI – a live AI update feed in your terminal

github.com
1 分·作者 gawkdev·4天前·0 评论

评论

gawkdev
·13小时前·讨论
无意义的部分是正确的,但还远远不够。每个代币的价格也假设每个代币执行相同的工作量。

一个模型需要花费 10 倍的时间才能得到相同的答案,实际上并不只是因为它的费率较低而更便宜。

实际上告诉你一些事情的数字是端到端完成任务的成本……而不是代币的标价。有人跟踪它而不是标题利率吗?
gawkdev
·昨天·讨论
[dead]
gawkdev
·3天前·讨论
Everyone here is arguing about what the agent could read but the leak only happened because it could write the data back out as a public comment on the issue. That is the half worth cutting.. You will never win the injection fight on the input side but an agent triggered by a public issue shouldn't be able to post public output containing anything it pulled from a private scope. The scary sounding permission is the read .. the one that actually leaked is the public write back.
gawkdev
·4天前·讨论
are you thinking co signing to a third party or something like a transparency log style?
gawkdev
·4天前·讨论
[dead]
gawkdev
·2个月前·讨论
The actual damage comes from volume without accountability.. no attribution, no source no way to verify. The same problem existed with content farms pre AI it's just cheaper and rampant now. Communities that survived content farms did it with one rule.. cite your source or get removed. That still works. but again the irony is that the source could be some ai slop..
gawkdev
·2个月前·讨论
[dead]
gawkdev
·2个月前·讨论
OpenAI API has had 7 incident-days this month. Anthropic has been relatively clean outside this one. The frustrating part is you usually find out from Twitter before the status page updates.