gilcot

no profile record

·5个月前·讨论

Another loser here to second you

·5个月前·讨论

And that’s not true! He did want to keep the editor stable and available for many platforms and compatible with vi. Rejected proposals break one of these rules.

gilcot

·5个月前·讨论

do you mean http://cream.sourceforge.net/

gilcot

·5个月前·讨论

Merci.

gilcot

·5个月前·讨论

I loved using it to write and browse my html files. It can do troff too <3

gilcot

·7个月前·讨论

No, the editor is "ex" (for extended ed…) and "vi" is it's other face… (when you call vi, it’s same as calling ex then issuing :visual command…)

gilcot

·7个月前·讨论

And they're "codenames" not supposed to be as obvious as names…

gilcot

·7个月前·讨论

That's because "ed" was the "editor" (and that later was abbreviated "ed"…) when sed born.

gilcot

·7个月前·讨论

As unique as: Go, Python, R, Rust, Word, Writer, --"

gilcot

·7个月前·讨论

And before the rise of heavy IDE, you need some coffee to write all those SomeObscureWord.longLongStuf.notSoShortOne.LastSentence()

gilcot

·9个月前·讨论

Do you mean doas ?

gilcot

·3年前·讨论

You were a github consumer.

You are now a git user.

gilcot

·3年前·讨论

You're supposed to write things like `\chapter{the title}` (so focusing on the content) instead of dealing with: font family/size/weight/variant/shape, text color/flushing/decoration, you know all those formatting you're always playing with with text editors for example.

gilcot

·3年前·讨论

And so will be in next century.

评论