groundzeros2015·17小时前·讨论这实际上是一个我没有看到过的重要观点。清晰的架构和良好的设计的动机是能够随着时间的推移不断发展系统。 LLM代码有这样的能力吗？ LLM 本身能够迭代递增吗？原
groundzeros2015·17小时前·讨论是的，因为 C 是一个成熟的系统，人们已经学会了如何处理内存问题，并拥有一整套工具来查找它们。在编译时找到它们比在运行时找到它们更便宜吗？是的。但这并不是一个未解决的问题。原
groundzeros2015·前天·讨论What? How can it possibly talk about the decision without the risks? It doesn’t even refer to a source where I can learn more.Did you ask the LLM about your claim that no level was safe?
groundzeros2015·前天·讨论I agree. And so when we make up or transfer numbers in a database it has real world impact.
groundzeros2015·前天·讨论> the safe level is zero.This is not true of any substance.> Well it is scary and harmfulWell that narrative certainly came through. The facts supporting it did not.> Do you work for the chemical industry?No. Do you? Does this invalidate that the article did not use the opportunity to inform me?
groundzeros2015·3天前·讨论And the ideal consumer takes everything and pays nothing. Let’s see where they meet!
groundzeros2015·3天前·讨论That number that you don’t think is real lets you claim actual resources now and in the future.I think you should equally be confused about abstractions such as university credentials, or citizenship.
groundzeros2015·3天前·讨论Indeed. And according to MMT what that does is claim economic output for the government (work resources etc), without direct taxation.
groundzeros2015·3天前·讨论People literally work their lives for that representation. It’s not the value itself but it’s a way to store and transfer certain kinds of value.
groundzeros2015·3天前·讨论The article fails to mention risk and the amounts that create those. In typical journalist fashion it just emphasizes the word “chemical” and other scary framings.
groundzeros2015·3天前·讨论> You don’t get next day prime except in a relatively small proportion of the countryI agree that the cost or level of service differs (it literally costs more to serve you).