hiharryhere

2个月前讨论

He’s talking about AI scanning tools collectively, not specifically Mythos.

If you read his own top comment on that LinkedIn post he clarifies:

“The simple reason is: the (AI powered) tools are this good now. And people use these tools against curl source code.They find lots of new problems no one detected before. And none of these new ones used Mythos. Focusing on Mythos is a distraction - there are plenty of good models, and people who can figure out how to get those models and tools to find things.”

hiharryhere

9个月前讨论

Government isn’t perfect but I’d be interested to know what alternative you propose?

hiharryhere

9个月前讨论

Is it? It would be incredible if the government didn’t have specific requirements for critical infrastructure.

Say you’re an energy company and an incident could mean that a big part of the country is without power, or you’re a large bank and you can’t process payroll for millions of workers. They’re ability to recover quickly and completely matters. Just recently in Australia an incident at Optus, a large phone company, prevented thousands of people from making emergency calls for several hours. Several people died including a child.

The people should require these providers behave responsibly. And the way the people do that is with a government.

Companies behave poorly all the time. Red tape isn’t always bad.

hiharryhere

10个月前讨论

Bundler already does this.

  # From a specific branch
  gem 'my_gem', git: 'https://github.com/user/my_gem.git', branch: 'development'

  # From a specific tag
  gem 'my_gem', git: 'https://github.com/user/my_gem.git', tag: 'v1.2.3'

  # From a specific commit (ref)
  gem 'my_gem', git: 'https://github.com/user/my_gem.git', ref: 'a1b2c3d4e5f6g7h8i9j0k1l2m3n4o5p6q7r8s9t0'

hiharryhere

10个月前讨论

If supply chain integrity is the issue specifically for Shopify, couldn’t they run their own private, internally facing gem repository and whitelist everything that goes there? It’s not a requirement to use the public rubygems.

hiharryhere

7年前讨论

Incredibly the API links from 2011 still work. Just followed one mentioned in that old discussion:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3054726

hiharryhere

7年前讨论

The biometrics of the face.

Linked article states: "The General Data Protection Regulation, which came into force last year, classes facial images and other biometric information as being a special category of data, with added restrictions on its use."

hiharryhere

提交

Trump has changed the future of the car industry

Is GitHub a social network that endangers children? Australia wants to know

评论