HackerLangs
热门最新趋势评论往期问答秀出招聘

hsuduebc2

903 声望加入于 6年前

提交

[untitled]

1 分·作者 hsuduebc2·前天·0 评论

Ask HN: What are your best ideas you will probably never build?

5 分·作者 hsuduebc2·28天前·6 评论

Facebook and Messenger Hit by Global Outage

independent.co.uk
28 分·作者 hsuduebc2·29天前·2 评论

We suggest using living spiders as cooling devices for data centers (2020)

marksilberstein.ece.technion.ac.il
36 分·作者 hsuduebc2·上个月·16 评论

Meta launches Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp subscriptions

techcrunch.com
6 分·作者 hsuduebc2·上个月·3 评论

AI is creating new occupations

economist.com
4 分·作者 hsuduebc2·5个月前·1 评论

Should facial analysis help determine whom companies hire?

economist.com
3 分·作者 hsuduebc2·8个月前·6 评论

An algorithm that turns images into Obama

github.com
3 分·作者 hsuduebc2·9个月前·2 评论

OpenAI will reportedly release a TikTok-like social app alongside Sora 2

engadget.com
3 分·作者 hsuduebc2·9个月前·0 评论

评论

hsuduebc2
·9小时前·讨论
这项具体的研究本身可能并不道德败坏,他的意图也可能不坏,但它绝对可能导致可怕的事情。核技术最初的发展也是出于良好的意图,为人类带来了很多好处。但当然,最终的结局是最大的坏人拥有大量核武器。
hsuduebc2
·昨天·讨论
我一看到火箭、星星或火焰表情符号,就会停止阅读。这个网站上铺天盖地的废话让人着迷。胡说八道者发表胡说八道,而其他胡说八道者的反应是 "有趣"。

他们甚至连 em 破折号都不去掉!

对于积极找工作的人来说,这个网站绝对没用。他们的求职搜索很糟糕,总是显示不相关的结果。唯一有用的部分是,招聘人员可以直接与你联系,而现在大多数工作似乎都是这样招聘的。
hsuduebc2
·前天·讨论
确切地。我认为自己是欧元联邦主义者,但像这样的废话引起了非常强烈的反感。

如果这不是出于安全原因扫描用户消息的见不得人的举动,比如可能爆发的战争,那么这就太荒谬了。

我怀疑推动这一举措的政客们是否不明白恋童癖者根本不需要使用他们正在扫描的这些应用程序。但我看到美国老官员对科技首席执行官的质疑,以及对当前技术缺乏基本知识的情况令人震惊。
hsuduebc2
·前天·讨论
据我了解这一点。它基本上使提供聊天服务的公司能够扫描您的消息。
hsuduebc2
·前天·讨论
或者您也可以托管自己的服务器,例如 IRC。这太愚蠢了,如果他们认为恋童癖者会突然开始使用WhatsApp,那么我非常怀疑他们的基本素养。

他们用来推动这一荒谬议程的如此薄弱的推理和方法让我强烈怀疑其背后一定还有其他东西。
hsuduebc2
·前天·讨论
I gave up reading when I got my first portable computer. Not sure why. But after some time I got sick of it and got back to reading and I love it!

For some reason I suddenly got an urge to read long deep fantasy. Storm light archive is perfect for this, I recommend play some fantasy reading music on background. It's a bliss, especially in summer afternoon with cold coffe.
hsuduebc2
·前天·讨论
Then maybe you should not read prose. It is about conveying an experience, a story. You might have simply picked a bad author. Personally, I prefer long reads. I understand that some people might not enjoy that style of storytelling, but saying “give up reading” overall is a shame. Try something like Warhammer 40k novels. They are simple, entertaining, and split into shorter parts. What you are describing does not happen there.
hsuduebc2
·3天前·讨论
Interesting phenomens are often discussed here so I personally do not perceive it as offtopic. Yet as you said, I have the same feeling from this article. Click bait grievance posting.
hsuduebc2
·3天前·讨论
>"Eurobarometer by the EU shows Europeans love the EU"

seems legit lol

Probably because most Europeans are clueless and brainwashed by MSM pro-EU propaganda, and never hear about the nasty things the EU tries to do like chat control, age-ID, car surveillance, or taxing parcels.


So which is it?

Are the stats fake, or are Europeans actually saying this because they are brainwashed?

Because you are trying to have both. First, official EU polling is illegitimate propaganda. Then, in the next breath, you explain why Europeans really do support the EU. That means the poll is not fake. You just hate the answer.

Every result you dislike is fake, and every person who disagrees with you is brainwashed. Very brave epistemology.
hsuduebc2
·3天前·讨论
You are mistaking Hacker News for Xitter or Truth Social. This is not an argument, it is just a pile of buzzwords and grievance posting.

“Next Stasi”, “eurocrats”, “cripple domestic agriculture”, “dumping German diesel cars”, “useless talk”. None of this actually responds to the point about European energy dependence.
hsuduebc2
·3天前·讨论
I agree on the base of the argument. EU after all was created because of one tragedy. I'm absolutely sure that there will be more gruesome wars on the continent and I even wouldn't rule out the collapse in the future because petty tribalism holding everything back as always.

But this is the hatred you are talking about?

https://www.politico.eu/article/europeans-embrace-eu-gloom-w...
hsuduebc2
·3天前·讨论
Maybe “your own city” would be a more precise metaphor than “your own house”. Your country is your house, but the EU is the city around it, with the roads, infrastructure, shared rules, market, security, and institutions that make the house function.

The concept of a modern nation is also relatively new. It emerged as an identity for groups of people who were no longer defined mainly by the monarchs ruling over them. That identity replaced the king as the symbol of belonging.

But now nationalism is often doing the opposite. Instead of freeing people from old power structures, it is holding Europe back.

So yes, maybe it is not literally “your house”, but the point still stands. Burning down the city around your house is not exactly a smart move either.
hsuduebc2
·3天前·讨论
Exactly. This is ridiculous behavior. Simple solutions for complex problems are usually the wrong ones.

One griefer which promised prosperit fueled Brexit, which caused Britain visible stagnation and now he is a candidate for MP promising to fixing it all yet again.

I need to repeat, that Simple solutions for complex problems usually do not work.
hsuduebc2
·3天前·讨论
https://archive.ph/7A8cW
hsuduebc2
·4天前·讨论
Out of curiosity. There aren't any payment card processors other than Stripe? I thought I saw bunch of them.
hsuduebc2
·4天前·讨论
Sure they will, but that doesn't mean that every bad guy should have nuclear weapon. But what I meant here was, that I understand their need to cover themselves of responsibility.
hsuduebc2
·4天前·讨论
It's pretty annoying, yet somehow understendable. I sometimes get irrationally angry when being lectured by a clanker.
hsuduebc2
·4天前·讨论
I think he means by some obscure manipulation. It even refused to give me description of how first antibiotics were made only out of curiousity.
hsuduebc2
·4天前·讨论
Absolutely. I meant their occasionally usefull services in general like ec2, s3, etc...

They probably exists but usere still not accepted them as an standard.
hsuduebc2
·4天前·讨论
That was mainly my point. If you are paying for security, you are paying for someone's obedience. Not even mentioning that European armies dependant on American weapons is gigantic security risk, which no one ever will be held accountable. This all I perceive as biggest US influence based weapon which is slowly slipping away.

I understand that politically it is sold as that European countries are leeches, which is absolutely an valid optic, but I believe this was still trade benefiting US more than Europeans.

Needles to say I would gladly see my country spend much more on military, reform pensions system which is absolutely botched and become much more self-confident.