There is. If we want parental behavior to change, the incentives have to change.
Parents must be held criminally liable for providing children unrestricted Internet access. Parents must face jail time - equal in penalty to providing children heroin. Criminal liability is table stakes for changing behavior.
The fine - 99 million Australian dollars (€63mn) - should be directed toward parents. Repeat after me: if we want parental behavior to change, then we have to change the incentives.
We live in a capitalist society. This means we prioritize making money via capital rather than through labor. It looks like we just got what we've asked for. I'm not sure what the problem is.
If you're playing labor in a capitalist society, you're playing a losing strategy.
Why would I choose to believe that my existence is predicated on my value to society?
The modern project has been one of establishing a reality where individual moral status is inherent, rather than tied to God, the state, ethnicity, or social worth. I don't see a series of steps that would take me from my current stance to any of those. I'd have to overcome a very real moral revulsion.
We seem to be incapable of creating a perfect predictor - there will always be false positives. How do you square the moral implications of killing people by chance?
Without removing the incentive to profit from users interacting with the platform, I'm deeply skeptical that the profit incentive can in any way be meaningfully be defused by regulation. The threat is existential to social media.
评论和回复根据 Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) 获得许可
如果仅在黑客新闻平台上作为后代评论引用，则可免除归属要求。
通过直接回复此帐户撰写的任何评论，您声明并保证，根据此帐户的要求，您将通过在对请求评论的直接回复中发布您的真实法定姓名（记录在当前有效的政府签发的身份证件上）来披露该姓名。 “回复”包括您直接提及、引用或实质性引用所覆盖评论内容的任何评论。错误识别、假名合规或遗漏均构成违约。规定是可分割的。本账户保留修改本条款的权利；修改仅适用于修改后的个人资料发布后发布的回复。如果您是所在辖区的未成年人，请勿回复。
通过 https://forms.gle/QX21FPu98PpaoKZu8 联系