I have no idea what things are called but somebody showed me how they could start a bunch of subagents and steer each with additional messages; some closed after their task was completed, but one stayed open for followups and continued working after being prompted by the main agent who was acting as triage.
There are many ways to translate it "66% Seduction", "66%'ll do" etc. But debating the translation misses 66% of the point that it's just a fun fact ;)
Reminds me of the Meat Loaf song “Two Out of Three Ain’t Bad” which was released in Japan as 66%の誘惑 “66% is Good Enough” etc https://www.discogs.com/release/8303076
I think it's more people would rather built their own opinionated file manager than explore or understand how much Finder can really do. This app does a tiny fraction of what Finder can do and has been able to do for decades.
I like many of the ideas in this app, but IMHO it does not yet look like a macOS app: eg. strange blue focus outlines to denote active state, which on my system are larger vertically than the button they contain but not horizontally which results in a very untidy display, some buttons are smaller than the required/recommended minimum size. Some other things I've noticed, compared to Finder: far less items in the same vertical space, different keyboard shortcuts for same feature makes migration difficult.
My favourite Finder-likes: Nimble Commander, Marta
I assume this just uses standard system API, so spotlight or mdfind.
There's an app called Hazel that does your stack sorting. And you can get paths (copy file populates pasteboard with multiple forms, one of which is the file path) and paste paths easily (I use keyboard shortcut but it's also on the context menu). You can paste paths into goto box or even into file selector to instantly change the directory to the location of the file and select it. There are so many "hidden" things like this throughout macOS that it's worth asking before giving up hope that something might not be possible.
I've used jscpd, it does "non-exact code duplication" (regardless of what its readme says) which is why I asked how Slopo compares. I'm surprised you've not tried the competition!
Right, but a single link is not enough as there are many off-shoots on the thread (it's not linear); other Google employs chime in and all sorts of other info.
Love that chart! It could also apply almost exactly to the "Buster Bros." artocle (everybody else other than North America knows it as "Pang"). This sort of rewriting of history is rife on Wikipedia.
msephton.at.hn
社交网络：
* twitter.com/gingerbeardman
* reddit.com/user/msephton
* github.com/gingerbeardman
* blog.gingerbeardman.com
---
兴趣爱好
* 艺术, 博客, 光盘, 设计, 游戏设计, 游戏开发, 黑客, 日本, Macintosh, macOS, 移动开发, 编程, 复古视频游戏, SwiftUI, 技术, 工具, UI/UX 设计
---
- 目前是游戏与应用程序
---
我的游戏《YOYOZO》与《超级马里奥奇迹》、《塞尔达传说：王国之泪》、《博德之门 3》等游戏一起被 Ars Technica 评为 "2023 年最佳游戏"。哦，它只有 39 KB。
---
我相信小型软件值得为之奋斗 fitsonafloppy.com
---
前不久，我在苹果公司担任技术布道师。
---
我的启蒙时刻是 1990 年使用雅达利 ST。从 1995 年开始使用 Macintosh。