HackerTrans
热门最新趋势评论往期问答秀出招聘

nihsett

21 声望加入于 2个月前
联系人:gmail com 的 nihsett

评论

nihsett
·1小时前·讨论
Zig作者的文章好像改了?我不记得几天前读到它时底部的部分在那里。

> 雷的故事:面对内存错误的合理挑战,有几种可行的选择。管理层热切地批准了 Rust 重写选项,因为这是展示他们新的 Fable 模型的绝佳营销机会,Anthropic 已经使用 Rust,而 Zig 公开反对使用 Anthropic 的产品。

有点道理。今年早些时候他们还尝试制作一个 C 编译器。我不知道发生了什么事。

我想这对 Anthropic 来说是一个没有太大负面影响的实验,如果它有效,可以用它来阐述人工智能辅助编码的观点——如果它不能,用户将学到昂贵的教训,但谁在乎呢,这只是另一个让他们的产品变得更好的案例研究。

也就是说,我认为很高兴看到这一切真正实现。
nihsett
·9小时前·讨论
我觉得他们在最近几个月对其进行了优化,以燃烧更多代币。我手动对代码库做了约 100 行的小改动,然后交给 claude 进行审查。它催生了几个子代理并烧毁了大量代币。我想“回顾”这个词现在会触发某种内置技能或其他东西。荒谬的是,它的统治速度如此之快。
nihsett
·10小时前·讨论
Ghostty 是否有任何比 Kitty 更好的功能?我到处都看到这种情况,但我仍然不明白为什么它比现有的选项更好。

有人可以帮助我,这两者的电梯间距是什么,为什么值得一试?
nihsett
·2个月前·讨论
My dad exclusively uses perplexity and I think completely stopped using google. It's definitely more common than we realize.
nihsett
·2个月前·讨论
Yeah, me too. I argue with multiple models at the same time via a markdown doc to coordinate the discussion. I feel like it makes me less anxious about the final output if nothing else.
nihsett
·2个月前·讨论
That's true. GC and manual are the two ends of the spectrum with other options in between like Rust. By catastrophic mistakes I mean security vulnerabilities created by memory safety related mistakes.

Maybe it's just me but I cannot write a huge program in rust as easily as I can in Java or Python. I have to spend more effort bending my program to fit the language and it's semantics. I get safety and speed but it feel like I'm wearing a straitjacket for those gains paying in my time and productivity.

Sometimes that tradeoff makes sense, but if I'm writing a backend webserver or some other application why would I bother with all this effort. Just doesn't make sense to me.
nihsett
·2个月前·讨论
Buffer overflows for one. I don't have numbers but many security vulnerabilities have some kind of memory safety problem underneath.
nihsett
·2个月前·讨论
Exactly. 95% of programmers are application programmers - they ship software used by regular users. I think it's insane to use a non-GC language for most of those cases. Manual memory management is mentally taxing and it's easy to make catastrophic mistakes. The marginal benefit from it is just not worth it unless you're making games or a trading system.

5% who write tools or other "infra" layer for the other 95% to work on top of maybe need that level of control over memory. It doesn't make any sense to me to sign up for that complexity unless you really really need it.