HackerTrans
热门最新趋势评论往期问答秀出招聘

pylua

900 声望加入于 6年前

评论

pylua
·5天前·讨论
You mean mortars ?
pylua
·6天前·讨论
Seems like the reshaping of an industry and is disconcerting for those of us who work in it.
pylua
·8天前·讨论
Just post to the database then asynch send to message queue. Messages should still be idempotent by the consumer but at least this follows rest and is transactional.

It’s simple and easy to follow. At scale use multi tenancy.
pylua
·10天前·讨论
Every time I send a work email I leak my pii. We should all use government issued uuids on linked in / facebook.
pylua
·13天前·讨论
Yeah, I agree completely. This is very worrisome and is creating a multi class system.
pylua
·13天前·讨论
Small business owner in the U.S. ?
pylua
·14天前·讨论
Yeah, not many industries can compete but I don’t understand the fixation on only preserving auto.
pylua
·16天前·讨论
I wonder why the U.S. is only interested in protecting its car industry and not others.
pylua
·上个月·讨论
Yes. Don’t build the data center unless you can support that. What’s so strange about it?
pylua
·上个月·讨论
Even for wind or solar ?
pylua
·上个月·讨论
I agree with this, and it really exposes how two faced and scandalous these companies are.

They all love green energy, but will they use that for their data centers in your backyard?

Rules for the and not for me !
pylua
·上个月·讨论
I’m not against data centers, but they need to come with their own clean power supply, and export minimal pollution to its neighbors .

If you can’t provide that it’s not worth the downsides for the community.
pylua
·上个月·讨论
Do you think ai usage will decrease due to this change ?
pylua
·2个月前·讨论
Yeah, that is funny looking back. Books full of PII.

I always think when I send a work email I am also leaking my pii everywhere.
pylua
·2个月前·讨论
Eventually I would bet on ai using its own non human readable languages (brains?) to program in to reduce overhead.

It will be a black box, and the code will be generated just in time by ai for each api request
pylua
·3个月前·讨论
Arguably, since everything resolves to an axiom, isn’t the solution in any training set ?

The order and combination is what makes it special.

Is current human information access methods wrong, or do we just synthesize data in a way that is inefficient for this sort of problem solving ?
pylua
·3个月前·讨论
If that’s the case, are you saying the proof was part of the training set?

A lot of novelty is just gluing approaches together and reporting what sticks.
pylua
·3个月前·讨论
I’m a little confused. Pocket is outsourced to railway, which ended up deleting their data ?

I do find the author to be completely negligent , unless railway has completely lied about the safety in their product.
pylua
·3个月前·讨论
Are they practically doing this ?
pylua
·3个月前·讨论
I think someday it will be completely unreadable for humans. Ai will have its optimized form.