HackerLangs
热门最新趋势评论往期问答秀出招聘

shevy-java

2,105 声望加入于 3年前

评论

shevy-java
·9小时前·讨论
这就是它们如此难找的原因!
shevy-java
·17小时前·讨论
> 在舒适地阅读带有这么多括号的代码之后

我一直没能克服()。

与许多其他语言相比,Ruby 具有非常灵活的语法,
因为在很多情况下你可以省略语法。例如,使用
方法调用的 () 在很大程度上是可选的。所以
当我有 python 代码时:

猫 = 猫()
猫.喵()

我发现它比 ruby 代码更糟糕:

猫 = Cat.new
猫喵

(虽然你也可以在 ruby 中使用 ();但大多数人
不会这样做,因为这样做没有什么意义。)

但这只是一个表面问题。 Python最大的错误
就是要求内隐的自我。总感觉我需要
手持 python 并试图向它解释对象是什么
是什么以及自我是什么。在红宝石中我没有这个问题。注意事项
我发现两种语言都很好,但 ruby 是“更多”对象
出于多种原因,它比 python 更面向。

Lisp 却完全不同。我接触过它
通过方案,虽然它很有趣,但我觉得 lisp 是一个
比 ruby 或 python 更糟糕的编程语言。的
老游戏haxima/nazghul最终被放弃,主要是
由于时间不够,也因为作者不
不再相信方案(引擎的核心在于
C如果我没记错的话)。他尝试转用Python,
虽然,这不起作用(但是,我再次认为这主要是
由于时间不够)。 haxima/nazghul 中的方案代码
非常有趣(https://sourceforge.net/projects/nazghul/
如果你想看看那里的方案代码),但我很
更喜欢 ruby 或 python。虽然这会是
有趣的是,DSL 能够真正专注于
手头的游戏或项目,就像旧的 Zak McKracken 游戏一样。
shevy-java
·22小时前·讨论
这实际上很有趣——给了 C 开发人员改进 postgresql 的动力。毕竟人们可能会说“看,Rust 让这变得更容易”。
shevy-java
·前天·讨论
> 我对这么匆忙感到非常惊讶。

好吧,一旦你意识到所谓的“欧盟议会”什么都不是
但游说团体(参见 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatar_corruption_scandal_at_th...)这不再令人惊讶。对我来说,这里没有什么令人惊讶的,
快点也不慢。

游说者正在赢得这场战争。
shevy-java
·前天·讨论
游说者赢得了这一轮。
shevy-java
·前天·讨论
太悲伤了。她的声音如此独特、独特。
shevy-java
·前天·讨论
我无法评估所提出的主张,但即使我很宽容并且
假设这一切都是真的,对我来说,分布仍然很奇怪
变得如此依赖于一个人或一个提供者。我无能为力
但想知道其他发行版会如何处理这个问题;根图
可能不会以类似的情况结束,debian 可能
都没有。

请注意 - 只有当我评估所提出的主张的表面价值时才会如此。
我也忍不住觉得这里缺少一些步骤。当然,
IRC roid-raging 过去发生过,参见#freenode,人们很奇怪
总的来说,但即便如此,它对我来说读起来确实很奇怪,几乎就好像“我相信
那个来自尼日利亚的骗子用了我的钱,因为这些电子邮件非常有说服力”。
shevy-java
·前天·讨论
This assumes the mites are what kills the bees. What is that asssumption is flawed?
shevy-java
·前天·讨论
No. The mites are not what is killing the bees.

And, by the way - natural pathogens exist in just about any population. These very, very rarely led to extinction. There is a media trend to claim the mites are at fault. This reminds me of prior fault yielding e. g. "mad cow disease" - and then the media also stopped doing any further investigation at that point. It's as if they have break points where you can not go past those points. Now it is the mites that get blamed.
shevy-java
·前天·讨论
Still the honeybees keep on dying ...

Perhaps it is time to stop blaming the mites for the decline of the honeybees.
shevy-java
·前天·讨论
Voting on hackernews is a bit weird compared to reddit. The whole UI is strange to me.

Having said that, I noticed that there is in general too much content to consistently e. g. vote or do similar actions. I was watching Rossman's video almost daily in the past; stopped doing so a while ago simply because of lack of time on my part. I need to choose more carefully where I invest my time. (Also, for some reason, when Rossman was in New York, his videos had a better punch; not sure if I am the only one noticing this but he seemed to have a better focus when he was still in New York, even though I understand he relocated, to stop getting milked by politicians in New York.)
shevy-java
·前天·讨论
Good. However had, one question still remains: why did the US government not have this automatically put in place in general? The title refers to one company for the most part. The question is why the US government, which assumingly should work for the people, prioritizes private commercial interests over individual ownership models.
shevy-java
·前天·讨论
Well, it is some kind of social control. People who conform, have more rights than those who reject fascism.
shevy-java
·前天·讨论
Slaves also have no right to privacy. This EU variant is doomed to failure.
shevy-java
·3天前·讨论
They hate us for our freedom.
shevy-java
·3天前·讨论
This is a bit skewed. AfD stands for a lot more than "merely" an opponent of chat control, including worshipping the 1930s era.

As another example, one of their members (Noah Krieger) fights on behalf of Russia, conquering lands and killing civilians (article from today only in german, sorry: https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/videos-mit-schutzweste-u...). And many other problems I could list about AfD. So t he "they want to ban those opposing chat control" - sorry, that is a huge simplification.

> It would be hard to imagine a US party that didn't believe the other party is out of compliance with US values.

Ah? And why are there only two corrupt parties in the USA to begin with? I mean that's no real choice. Both are corrupt, and one now entered cult-status with the mad orange king. His cronies get rich. Everyone sees this. So, sorry, but your attempt to promote the USA while praising the AfD, is simply flat out rubbish nonsense. We only have bad actors here, no good ones.
shevy-java
·3天前·讨论
Lobbyists control the EU. So much is clear to everyone now.

I think there is no way to fix this system from the inside - it is designed to be abused like that. We need an alternative system.
shevy-java
·3天前·讨论
No, I think the term applies very well. That there are worse dictatorships does not really nullify the statement.

Even "democracies" have death penalties and commit to genocide. See the USA as an example here. One can always reason that there are worse countries in this regard - nobody rejects that either.

We need to have a much more nuanced view on democracy. The EU presently is not one.
shevy-java
·3天前·讨论
Lobbyists running the show. It's kind of a copy/paste of the US system.
shevy-java
·4天前·讨论
Europe right now is the ultimate US vasall. Germany is the leader here; France and Netherlands are much more self-conscious but also way too dependent on US corporations. The worst part is that in Germany with Merz in charge, this will not change. He is a good puppy for the USA.