HackerTrans
热门最新趋势评论往期问答秀出招聘

slederer

no profile record

提交

[untitled]

1 分·作者 slederer·2个月前·0 评论

[untitled]

1 分·作者 slederer·2个月前·0 评论

[untitled]

1 分·作者 slederer·3个月前·0 评论

Lovable vs. Bolt vs. Replit: who's leaking the most Supabase data?

securityscanner.dev
4 分·作者 slederer·3个月前·0 评论

[untitled]

1 分·作者 slederer·3个月前·0 评论

AI-Assisted Jira Workflows and One-Shot Fixes with Kotlin Koog and OpenAI Codex

bitmovin.com
2 分·作者 slederer·5个月前·0 评论

Bringing Content Authenticity to Video Streaming: C2PA Integration with Bitmovin

bitmovin.com
1 分·作者 slederer·7个月前·0 评论

A Tale of Two AI Failures: Debugging a Simple Bug with LLMs

bitmovin.com
9 分·作者 slederer·8个月前·17 评论

Sub-Second Streaming at Scale with Media over QUIC (MoQ)

bitmovin.com
2 分·作者 slederer·8个月前·0 评论

评论

slederer
·3个月前·讨论
We independently scanned 500+ Lovable-deployed apps as part of a larger study of 1,764 vibe-coded apps. The RLS problem is systemic — not a one-off. X% of Lovable apps we tested had wide-open Supabase tables where the anon key could read/write everything. The $6.6B question isn't whether the product is useful, it's whether the security liability of millions of deployed apps becomes a material risk. We published the full breakdown: securityscanner.dev/reports/2026-q2
slederer
·3个月前·讨论
[dead]