I’ve read that before, it engages well but I’m not sure they all know what human babies sound like, it just gets a reliable response and other frequencies are either ignored or don’t get then the response they like the most
A lot of times they respond or acknowledge as well, just not with their eyes
They wont look at you because its not their primary way of “seeing” or spatializing the world or their etiquette
Their ears might briefly move in your direction, their tail might flick in one of their frustrating ways, they might not move a muscle (which is a conscious response for them as well)
I sometimes like seeing who will call me out when I’m speaking confidently.
I have to reaaaaaaaaaallly dumb things down for that to happen, in person. Its not even people ignoring its like people willing to repeat the incorrect thing I said!
I only noticed when I was making deadpan jokes and pepple couldnt tell. And so it began.
sometimes I just say things very bluntly because others are doing it but wont say it
this is very intentional as opposed to misreading the room, as its definitely for introspective purposes, but maybe I could fit on some part of the spectrum solely for thinking its okay to say divisive things!
Yeah I just nod and agree with co-worker’s exclusionary forms of inclusion, to continue exchanging time for money and potentially sex with that co-worker.
Submitting a PR runs into the most random etiquette expectations from a gatekeeping project maintainer that arbitrarily chooses to not merge
It requires a lot more effort and back and forth than you are describing and its disingenuous. I’m glad you’ve had a good experience with it though.
Writing an automation tool often has nothing to do with the experience and acumen required for a job, it could be a mouse motion recording to a bash script. It requires pure happenstance or contrived altruism to do it in a worse language for the task just to say “see look what I did” for a future employer
I think this requires more empathy, not in an “emotional intelligence” sense just in the concept of putting yourself in other people’s shoes and imagining what they encounter instead thinking what you encounter is normal
A car mechanic isn’t evaluated for a job by whether they fix their own car as a successful one may own a luxury car that must be serviced at a specific location.
Since analogies compare dissimilar things with at least one similarity, I think you lost the one similarity and undermined the point you thought you were making
What does a programmer seeing a bug have to do with this conversation? What exactly are you imagining? I’m imagining how silly it would be for me to run a custom version of a chrome extension that wont get any updates just because I didnt like how a feature was implemented, I’m guessing you are imagining something else?