HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

LightHugger

no profile record

comments

LightHugger
·18 天前·discuss
[flagged]
LightHugger
·18 天前·discuss
[flagged]
LightHugger
·18 天前·discuss
[flagged]
LightHugger
·18 天前·discuss
[flagged]
LightHugger
·18 天前·discuss
[flagged]
LightHugger
·2 個月前·discuss
He was dragged for persistently lying about it, doing everything in his power to shut down discussion of it, and being absurdly hostile on a personal level to the founder of the initiative unprovoked. Not for being against it.
LightHugger
·2 個月前·discuss
what's the risk? "Oh no we might have to provide the product we sold!" Lmao. That's the right kind of risk to force on sellers in a market. Sellers risk getting penalized for not providing what they have paid for. Great. Fanastic. Sounds healthy for any market and may even increase average customer confidence enough for a surge in sales, one that can't be created by one company alone.
LightHugger
·2 個月前·discuss
Ross has had a consistent vision for years and i'm not sure where this delusion otherwise is coming from. At this point i'm wondering if people like you are just astroturf bots funded by the ESA.
LightHugger
·2 個月前·discuss
There is no reason to reply like this unless you are some kind of scammer with no ethics. I hope this bill bankrupts your business model.
LightHugger
·2 個月前·discuss
the idea of a "shutdown bill" is absurd and irrelevant to the law being discussed unless you are a scammer being forced to refund people.
LightHugger
·2 個月前·discuss
this is absurd and untrue. this is like being told you have to pour a concrete pillar 2 meters to the left of where you were planning so that you're not destroying some vital infrastructure, then bemoaning the loss of the concrete pillar industry.

Stop building games to self destruct. Once you fix your bad practices (which, you should not have been doing to begin with, pay for them once with some retooling and moving forward you don't need to pay more, then get some ethics and you will incur fewer costs like this going forward) there is no ongoing cost here.
LightHugger
·6 個月前·discuss
> I'm surprised AdaFruit did something wrong here. They frequently blog about their stances on issues and seem to try to take the moral high ground on a lot of issues.

This aspect is not very surprising, it is usually moral high grounders who end up found to be doing something wrong, people like to compensate and try to put down others when they know they are in the wrong.
LightHugger
·6 個月前·discuss
The car wasn't moving until they surrounded her car, that was the issue. She was blocking off traffic deliberately. She had to be arrested but tried to violently escape and was killed as a result of her actions. Please try to be more aligned with reality instead of just being a crazy person repeating false things then not acknowledging each and every time you're proven wrong, as you were here today.
LightHugger
·6 個月前·discuss
The bodycam has been released, he was clearly hit by the car. The police had the car surrounded and were trying to make an arrest. She decided to escape through his body. https://x.com/nicksortor/status/2009683575298211979
LightHugger
·6 個月前·discuss
[flagged]
LightHugger
·6 個月前·discuss
Funnily enough I am a leftist, there are still some of us who aren't crazy or willing to lie for political ends :)
LightHugger
·6 個月前·discuss
[flagged]
LightHugger
·6 個月前·discuss
[flagged]
LightHugger
·6 個月前·discuss
[flagged]
LightHugger
·6 個月前·discuss
I just saw this as well. Here it is showing the car ramming the police officer, fortunately he was not injured. https://x.com/InsiderWire/status/2008974675171504504