HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

newfeatureok

no profile record

comments

newfeatureok
·6 年前·discuss
It seems that the underlying assumption here is that people who are highly educated and work in "clinical child development or similar" are superior at giving advice. Is this actually true? I'm also skeptical of the idea that support is best given as advice as opposed to something tangible.

If you indeed have a way to give superior advice to parents and result in presumably superior outcomes for parents and their children compared to the default, which is a parent who uses their own resources wouldn't it be more profitable to just open up a daycare?

In any case, I wish the Trustle team good luck, but I'm very skeptical that this is superior to just talking to people who have kids already. Kids are unique, but what constitutes a good environment isn't as broad as the landing page and marketing make it sound. Furthermore, if one does believe kids are unique that is with odds with the technology aspect of this business. Either kids are so unique that technology can't really be used to make things more efficient, or kids can be roughly grouped into categories, in which case - surely said information about children is already out there?

Finally - if blogs and content out of the web cannot be trusted, why should your experts' advice be? There are very smart people out there who have written books and blog posts. What's the value add beyond that? Since you're only paired with a single person, what if there is contradictory advice between your experts? Would you not simply be back at square one then?
newfeatureok
·6 年前·discuss
> Exactly. It's not a technical issue as much as an issue of focus/interest. Unfortunately, this has been a losing battle since 2008.

This is true, but there are a lot of features missing from a responsive site that apps have. Of course, I'd argue that all of the missing functionality can easily be added to Safari and Chrome (to name the big two mobile browsers).
newfeatureok
·6 年前·discuss
None of my most used apps are responsive pages because Safari neuters the functionality.

- White Noise -> Safari can't play background sounds once closed.

- Messenger -> Notification trouble, not to mention Facebook won't let you use the mobile version of Messenger without a lot of effort.

- Google Maps -> Close, but a lot of the functionality, like reminders require notifications which isn't up-to-par with just Safari

- Teams -> See messenger.
newfeatureok
·6 年前·discuss
Honestly I think the future of mobile will just be... mobile websites.

What's missing until regular websites have parity with mobile apps in functionality?

- Accelerometer and all sensor support (some of these are already supported on various browsers on various OSes)

- Background support

- Bluetooth

- WiFi

- Better notifications

- etc.

Sure there will always be a need for native, but 99% of apps don't need any of that stuff, really. Though I suppose both Apple and Google have an inherent interest to gatekeep.

Looking at my own most used apps:

- Messenger

- Mail

- White Noise

- Teams

- Google Maps

Literally all of them could be implemented as responsive pages with acceptable performance. There are a small number of companies that don't bother with mobile apps, Craigslist being the most notable of them until a few months ago. Part of the issue though is that the app stores give you a lot of visibility and to get that visibility you need to be in the app store. Sure you can use a web view, but in some ways that's even worse than just a responsive website because now you have to deal with the abstraction of your site that is a WebView. Not to mention the temptation to try for "best of both worlds".