Cloudproxy – hide your scrapers IP behind the cloud(github.com)
github.com
Cloudproxy – hide your scrapers IP behind the cloud
https://github.com/claffin/cloudproxy
115 comments
For one pet project I had to crawl a rather popular site. While that worked in general I would frequently get internal server errors. Turns out that this was the response of their CDN when it detected bot-like behavior. That left me wondering how they prevent search engine crawlers from being detected as bots and getting throttled this way as well. Turns out they just check the user agent for that. As soon as I put "Googlebot" in my user agent the frequent errors vanished. So sometimes it's not about using the right IP addresses, but just the right keywords in your user agent. ;-)
This probably means incompetency on the CDN’s part - Cloudflare has a detection rule for fake googlebots and it checks by doing reverse DNS to see if it’s really Google. Doing this trick is more likely to get your IP marked for spam, at least if you crawl CF sites with it.
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/crawling/...
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/crawling/...
How does Google get around cloaking? Don't they need to visit a site from time to time without coming in as Googlebot to make sure they're getting presented the same page as Googlebot?
Or is that always done via manual review?
Or is that always done via manual review?
They might pretend to be on other networks they own when they do things like ad/policy reviews (eg. the Google Fi or Google Fiber ASNs[0]), but I don't know of anyone confirming that this happens.
0: https://bgp.he.net/AS16591
0: https://bgp.he.net/AS16591
Changing user agent to Google it or whatever also lets you past quite a few paywalls too. Or at least it used to. These days I don't even bother
Doesn't Amazon have an API? Why everyone wants to scrape Amazon? Honest question.
Amazon's marketplace APIs are available to developers who register through a seller account. Pricing is $40 per month.
The main benefit of using the API is that you can request a LOT of data without hitting their rate limit. Unless you need to get dozens of results per second, you are usually better off with a spider (or just use Huginn). And if you are hit with a 503 and a captcha, gluing a free captcha solver with some middleware is a trivial task.
The main benefit of using the API is that you can request a LOT of data without hitting their rate limit. Unless you need to get dozens of results per second, you are usually better off with a spider (or just use Huginn). And if you are hit with a 503 and a captcha, gluing a free captcha solver with some middleware is a trivial task.
But other comments say scraping Amazon is kind of complicated because they ban IPs? I am not sure if you have a seller / affiliate account and then use your home IP to do scaping, will that impact your seller / affiliate account ?
You shouldn't use the same IP to continuously scrape Amazon. Personally I use a $8/month rotating proxy service that gives me a new proxy list every hour (webshare.io if it piques your interest, I'm in no way associated with them).
Also, in my experience Amazon's "ban" comes down to solving a captcha on every request, so it's more like some mild throttling than a real ban.
Also, in my experience Amazon's "ban" comes down to solving a captcha on every request, so it's more like some mild throttling than a real ban.
> free captcha solver
I haven't looked into this space, but what is a free captcha solver? And what is the drawback? Wouldn't this defeat the purpose of a captcha?
I haven't looked into this space, but what is a free captcha solver? And what is the drawback? Wouldn't this defeat the purpose of a captcha?
I'm using a ML-based captcha solver that is free software available on Github. So far it has solved 100% of the Amazon captchas it has encountered.
The reason Amazon have a reputation of being good at blocking IPs is that their responses are (purposefully?) obscure. The way it works, it filters out script kiddies and lets engineers through, which probably are a small minority of the people scraping Amazon.
The reason Amazon have a reputation of being good at blocking IPs is that their responses are (purposefully?) obscure. The way it works, it filters out script kiddies and lets engineers through, which probably are a small minority of the people scraping Amazon.
I also haven't looked into this space outside of a quick DDG search after reading your comment. It looks like the big hole is that Amazon rolled their own captcha a while ago and haven't kept up with what automation can do now.
Yes, all their product data is available for affiliates: https://webservices.amazon.com/paapi5/documentation/
Also, the document says "Product Advertising API is free". I am confused.
The access is only provided to active affiliates with sales. Amount of access is counted by number of sales too. More sales = more API access.
Thanks. This is very helpful. This information is not provided on the documentation.
API rates can be found here: https://webservices.amazon.com/paapi5/documentation/troubles...
Thanks. This is really annoying. Now I understand why people just want to scrape.
Amazon has one for their affiliates, you need to be approved and get 3 sales attributed to you in order to apply.
There's a bot in an IRC channel I've been on for over a decade that announces the <title> of any link being mentioned in the chan. It's becoming less and less useful as it's running on someone's vps, and a lot of sites behind cloudflare don't yield anything as they're returning the "checking your browser" page to the bot. Then there are pages that are pure javascript a d don't even deliver a title tag, and others try to show a GDPR banner or paywall and thus yield some generic title and not whatever article the link is supposed to show.
I guess it's time for a user-side script that sends the http request through their daily-driver browser to see what it is, but then they're getting their home computer to visit any and every link... Maybe only when it sees cloudflare DNS...
> puppeteer with stealth mode
I think sites like Zillow can detect after your third or fourth interaction that your actions aren't very human like and will prompt you a captcha.
I think sites like Zillow can detect after your third or fourth interaction that your actions aren't very human like and will prompt you a captcha.
Not following how this is helpful?
From what I've seen the cloud IPs are the first to get blocked by anti-scraping tech.
e.g. Built an amazon scraping thing at home. Worked fine. Deployed to cloud. Literally first request Amazon goes nope you're a bot
From what I've seen the cloud IPs are the first to get blocked by anti-scraping tech.
e.g. Built an amazon scraping thing at home. Worked fine. Deployed to cloud. Literally first request Amazon goes nope you're a bot
I have my crawlers running on a 24/7 notebook at my house because of that. No blocks whatever rate i use. Deployed to digital ocean runs for 5 minutes then blocked forever.
Essentially. All you're doing here is making it easy for the target sites to mass block a bunch of scrapers. Running it off your device is generally better.
This is relatively easy to block, given that these companies publish their IP ranges. Similar to the Tor block, blocking "datacenter IP's" simply becomes the norm. This is why you have companies offering "resi's" or residential proxies to bypass such blocks for some years now.
I heard a while back, on HN 8
I think, that a lot of residential proxies are computers that have been infected with malware. How true is that?
There have been a number of Chrome extensions which monetize by selling your bandwidth to provide this kind of service. Not ethical but probably not a compromise.
Browser extensions, and VPNs. Notably, Luminati was allegedly selling HolaVPN users as exit nodes. https://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/hk-en/security/news/cybercr...
This is not alledgedly but very much true. I was in the proxy business for a few years and in talks with the Luminati people to white-label their product for a very specific type of proxy.
It’s such a weird field to be in. It’s not illegal by definition of law, but you’re definitely in shady territory, with most of the customers being of the “get rich quick” persuasion. Or at the very least trying to cut corners. One way or another, they were not playing by the rules ;-)
It’s such a weird field to be in. It’s not illegal by definition of law, but you’re definitely in shady territory, with most of the customers being of the “get rich quick” persuasion. Or at the very least trying to cut corners. One way or another, they were not playing by the rules ;-)
Also the economic basis of a lot of "cell-phone farming".
A significant portion are grey market "ISPs" that purport to sell residential services but actually never do.
They sell these "residential" IPs to Amazon, other ecommerce retailers and shady people for an extreme price.
In the e-commerce world, scraping is necessary to stay in business. Amazon has armies of scrapers constantly monitoring their competitors, and in some cases automatically undercutting price updates.
They sell these "residential" IPs to Amazon, other ecommerce retailers and shady people for an extreme price.
In the e-commerce world, scraping is necessary to stay in business. Amazon has armies of scrapers constantly monitoring their competitors, and in some cases automatically undercutting price updates.
Same on the consumer side. I like setting up alerts on camelcamelcamel and seeing price history (to make sure I'm not getting screwed) and to buy buy buy when prices hit a certain theshold.
[deleted]
Are there even ethical or “official” ways to source residential IPs? I thought most of them were from botnet infected IoT devices.
I've heard of services that offer free proxy bandwidth in exchange for the user acting as a residential proxy node for other users and/or paying clients. It's generally marketed as a way for the user to avoid geoblocks and such. If this is clearly stated to the user upfront rather than buried behind half a dozen dark patterns and fine print, it seems like this business model could be conducted ethically. When it comes to whether the companies in this space are currently acting ethically though, I have serious doubts.
You have autobuying bots (sneakers or GPUs or other limited edition stuff) that need to do tricks like this. I wouldn't necessarily call them unethical.
In my opinion it's unethical if the website explicitly states in their terms of service that bot purchasing is not allowed. As far as I know, that is pretty common for websites that sell frequently scalped products, and near-ubiquitous among those that implement technical countermeasures.
I'd expect cybercriminals and fraudsters also find a pool of disposable residential IPs to be very useful.
I'd expect cybercriminals and fraudsters also find a pool of disposable residential IPs to be very useful.
A Terms of Service is not a proxy for morals though. Companies will put whatever is convenient for them in there, I'm sure you can come up with several examples that you wouldn't consider ethical.
I worked on a fairly large web-scraping project (around 2 million pages per day) and we used luminati. Amongst other things, they offer genuine residential proxies with user consent.
https://brightdata.com/proxy-types/rotating-residential-ips
https://brightdata.com/proxy-types/rotating-residential-ips
Reading that page, the “user consent” is dependent on third parties who are monetizing their app through this service to inform their users. I … um … doubt the third party app developers give a crap to accurately describe the traffic that will subsequently emanate from their users’ devices.
Just like everything else in this industry, the retort will be “but it’s the users fault! They didn’t scroll through the 2,375 page privacy policy, user agreement, hold harmless indemnification agreement, and terms of use when they agreed to an ad free experience for their mahjong app! What a stupid user! Ha!”
To that I say, enjoy the coming oppressive regulations. It’s already started. As a kid, I always wondered why we required stupid laws to regulate common sense. Now I know why.
Just like everything else in this industry, the retort will be “but it’s the users fault! They didn’t scroll through the 2,375 page privacy policy, user agreement, hold harmless indemnification agreement, and terms of use when they agreed to an ad free experience for their mahjong app! What a stupid user! Ha!”
To that I say, enjoy the coming oppressive regulations. It’s already started. As a kid, I always wondered why we required stupid laws to regulate common sense. Now I know why.
We don't need oppressive regulations; we simply need courts to adopt a sane definition of "agree".
If you're foisting an adhesion contract on more than 1,000 people, they are not deemed to have "agreed" unless a majority of a random sampling (say, ten) of them actually read and understood the entire document. Otherwise it's void. "Read and understood" is decided by a jury as part of any litigation involving the contract. "Random sampling" is made by court evidentiary procedures.
If the contract is negotiated or it was presented to less than 1,000 people the rules stay the way they currently are, since those are the kinds of contracts that English common law was developed for.
If you're foisting an adhesion contract on more than 1,000 people, they are not deemed to have "agreed" unless a majority of a random sampling (say, ten) of them actually read and understood the entire document. Otherwise it's void. "Read and understood" is decided by a jury as part of any litigation involving the contract. "Random sampling" is made by court evidentiary procedures.
If the contract is negotiated or it was presented to less than 1,000 people the rules stay the way they currently are, since those are the kinds of contracts that English common law was developed for.
> " with user consent."
things like this are ... iffy at best: https://www.vice.com/en/article/pga9yk/your-tool-to-access-n...
things like this are ... iffy at best: https://www.vice.com/en/article/pga9yk/your-tool-to-access-n...
luminati runs on holavpn which installs backdoor proxies on people's machines. that "user consent" is not actually known to the users but is buried in some terms & conditions when they're naively installing the "free VPN" software.
this company is run by a bunch of scam artists...they scammed me out of close to $10k
Packetstream.io buys bandwidth from users and is cheap. I‘m a customer.
Pretty good margins: They pay users $0.10/gb and they sell it to you for $1.
You can buy a bunch of mobile SIMs and use them.
[deleted]
[deleted]
In a related note the US Supreme Court just 10 days ago vacated a previous ruling against LinkedIn blocking a Scraper service. So the issue is back to the 9th circuit for a new determination that might, if reversed, change the landscape for Cloudflare and anyone else these operators try to sit behind.
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/linkedin-corp-v-...
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/linkedin-corp-v-...
I don’t think the Supreme Court ruled they can’t block them with technical means, just that they can’t sue them if they get around the block.
You are basically correct although it seems to hinge on the definition of an authorized use(r) and also they only vacated the appeals court decision so Microsoft will continue with the same case now in the lower court.
There is a good discussion of the more nuanced situation here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27510103
There is a good discussion of the more nuanced situation here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27510103
I indirectly worked on a project for a company trying to create an in house web indexer to track user generated content to find trends. Like 80% of the work was making it look like the web scrapers weren't coming from an IP in the cloud.
The IPs for the different cloud providers are super well known, and the big guys either put you behind captcha hell, or just flat out block you if you're coming from one of them.
The IPs for the different cloud providers are super well known, and the big guys either put you behind captcha hell, or just flat out block you if you're coming from one of them.
Is it ethical to scrape things, trying to bypass prevention methods, against the expressed wishes of a site?
As someone who has to deal with a lot of bots, bot networks and other weird scraper apps people use: The biggest issue is that most of these tools are not behaved very well. This tool is clearly designed to circumvent protections, rate limits mostly, against scraping that might be essential to keep things running.
They follow links that are explicitly marked as do not follow, they do not even try to limit their rate, they spoof their user agent strings etc etc. These bots cause real problems and cost real money. I do not think that kind of misuse is ethical. In fact, using this tool to circumvent protections can turn your scraping into a DDOS attack, which I do not feel are ethical.
If your bot behaves itself though, public information is public imo. Just don't take down websites, respect rate limits and do not follow 'no-follow' links.
To give an idea of the size of the issue, we have websites for customers that have maybe 5 hits per minute from actual users. Then _suddenly_ you go to 500 hits/minute for a couple of hours, because some bot is trying to scrape a calendar and is now looking for events in 1850 or whatever. (Not the greatest software that these links are still there tbh, but that is out of my control.)
Or another situation, not entirely related, but interesting i think: A few years back for days on end 80% of our total traffic came from random IPs across china & request could be traced through HTTP referrers where the 'user' had apparently opened a page in one province, then traveled to the other side of China and clicked a link 2 hours later.
All these things are relatively easy to mitigate, but that doesn't make it ethical.
They follow links that are explicitly marked as do not follow, they do not even try to limit their rate, they spoof their user agent strings etc etc. These bots cause real problems and cost real money. I do not think that kind of misuse is ethical. In fact, using this tool to circumvent protections can turn your scraping into a DDOS attack, which I do not feel are ethical.
If your bot behaves itself though, public information is public imo. Just don't take down websites, respect rate limits and do not follow 'no-follow' links.
To give an idea of the size of the issue, we have websites for customers that have maybe 5 hits per minute from actual users. Then _suddenly_ you go to 500 hits/minute for a couple of hours, because some bot is trying to scrape a calendar and is now looking for events in 1850 or whatever. (Not the greatest software that these links are still there tbh, but that is out of my control.)
Or another situation, not entirely related, but interesting i think: A few years back for days on end 80% of our total traffic came from random IPs across china & request could be traced through HTTP referrers where the 'user' had apparently opened a page in one province, then traveled to the other side of China and clicked a link 2 hours later.
All these things are relatively easy to mitigate, but that doesn't make it ethical.
Just so you know, adding rel="nofollow" has never been intended to prevent bots from following those links. Even famous crawlers like Bingbot will sometimes follow, and index pages linked to by "nofollow" links.
The only thing that rel="nofollow" does is tell search engines not to use that link in their PageRank computation.
If you do want to block well-behaved crawlers from crawling parts of your site, the proper way to do that is to use robots.txt rules.
The only thing that rel="nofollow" does is tell search engines not to use that link in their PageRank computation.
If you do want to block well-behaved crawlers from crawling parts of your site, the proper way to do that is to use robots.txt rules.
Exactly. We'd get customers thats sites would drown in bot traffic because they pulled the same shit, changing user agents, different ips, etc. I had to build custom mod security rules to block the patterns these boys would pull. What's funny is that the bots would have a site where you could control the crawl rates but it's just a placebo. They would crawl even if you requested them to stop.
The issue with bots hosted on AWS or any cloud for that matter is that as a web host you can't just block the IPs because legitimate traffic comes from them in the form of CMS plugins, backups, etc.
The issue with bots hosted on AWS or any cloud for that matter is that as a web host you can't just block the IPs because legitimate traffic comes from them in the form of CMS plugins, backups, etc.
Note that you can report spam to AWS https://support.aws.amazon.com/#/contacts/report-abuse
"... because some bot is trying to scrape a calendar and is now looking for events in 1850 or whatever."
Been there, done that - at least on the side of fixing it. Anyone who implements a calendar, don't make pervious and next links that let someone travel time forever.
I've always wondered how much bit traffic costs us - but never actually tried to figure it out. It is a good portion of our traffic - even when we block a lot of it.
Been there, done that - at least on the side of fixing it. Anyone who implements a calendar, don't make pervious and next links that let someone travel time forever.
I've always wondered how much bit traffic costs us - but never actually tried to figure it out. It is a good portion of our traffic - even when we block a lot of it.
I think it depends on the industry. I've worked at a few ecommerce companies and they all either bought data collected with scrapers or had a scraper team. They also paid for bot protection on their website to stop other companies from scraping their data. I have no problem with this, as ultimately consumers get more competitive and usually lower prices. That is assuming that they are scraping a reasonable rate and not sending 500 requests a second.
What does concern me is the other uses that scraping tools have. For example, what's to stop me from writing a bot specifically to fuck with a competitor's analytics and a/b testing?
What does concern me is the other uses that scraping tools have. For example, what's to stop me from writing a bot specifically to fuck with a competitor's analytics and a/b testing?
It doesn't really matter what's ethical and not, or what the site's wish - what matters is what the law says [1]. I don't want my neighbours smoking on the balcony below me, as I can smell their smoke but the law doesn't allow my building to ban it without consensus. Alas...
[1] https://techcrunch.com/2021/06/14/supreme-court-revives-link...
[1] https://techcrunch.com/2021/06/14/supreme-court-revives-link...
> I don't want my neighbours smoking on the balcony below me, as I can smell their smoke but the law doesn't allow my building to ban it without consensus.
That's simply because you're in multi-family housing, it would be a different story if the neighbors smoked and put up a fan to blow the smoke into your yard/window/etc, and that's probably a more apt comparison to bots that literally fork bomb themselves to crawl your site at 500 requests per second.
That's simply because you're in multi-family housing, it would be a different story if the neighbors smoked and put up a fan to blow the smoke into your yard/window/etc, and that's probably a more apt comparison to bots that literally fork bomb themselves to crawl your site at 500 requests per second.
I care since I try to be ethical in my actions.
Ethics requires reciprocity. These same sites care nothing about being a vector for JS malware.
Why can't we talk about ethics? There are a lot of things in this world that are legal, yet I choose not to do them because they are not ethical in my opinion.
We are allowed to talk about ethics separate from the law.
We are allowed to talk about ethics separate from the law.
Absolutely, especially if you want to keep an eye on specific behavior, -for example- sellers on Amazon.
It's public not behind a paywall or login. Just don't hammer the network, that is what most are concerned about as it costs money and time.
> Is it ethical to scrape things, trying to bypass prevention methods, against the expressed wishes of a site?
No, but many sites only allow Google to index them now.
I don't think that was the original plan for the web.
No, but many sites only allow Google to index them now.
I don't think that was the original plan for the web.
This is easy to block since all IPs of these cloud machines will belong to the same ASN.
Advanced scrapers mostly use residential IPs nowadays, but there are some services to detect those too, e.g. https://focsec.com/
Advanced scrapers mostly use residential IPs nowadays, but there are some services to detect those too, e.g. https://focsec.com/
Another idea: Buying an LTE modem/router. That IP address would probably be harder to block.
I agree, it would be impossible for sites to block individual customers behind carrier grade NAT without blocking other customers sharing that NAT endpoint.
Of course, the websites can raise an abuse complaint with the ISP, and they may take further action.
Of course, the websites can raise an abuse complaint with the ISP, and they may take further action.
Seems more economical to attach multiple IPs to a single instance and route traffic accordingly as opposed to spinning up multiple instances.
A similar approach I use is google cloud sdk + ssh socks5 proxy.
Create some preemptible instances on google cloud first, then connect them with commands like "gcloud compute ssh instances-name -- -D localhost:port".
And the last step is to connect scrapper to those proxy ports over localhost.
Create some preemptible instances on google cloud first, then connect them with commands like "gcloud compute ssh instances-name -- -D localhost:port".
And the last step is to connect scrapper to those proxy ports over localhost.
I proxy through an aws lambda. Works well for my lowish rate project.
Does anyone else do this?
I’ve been using lambda to scrape an api that technically is only available in their app. The api uses aws so running the scraper on lamda seems to have hidden it well enough. Doubt they want to start blocking amazon ips.
Hi all - I'm the creator of CloudProxy and only just came across this. Appreciate all the comments and stars (over 600 in less than two days). All the points shared are valid, you won't get the same effectiveness as residential IPs and may face issues with the proxies being blocked. That being said this solution, if you find they're not being blocked, is a lot cheaper and very quick. I've used it to scrape some major websites extensively without issue. I created it for my own use but then decided to open source it. Just hope you guys find it useful!
Hiding behind any larger cloud or VPN looks futile. If there's one place to hide scraper nowadays it's Apple's iCloud+ or whatever stupid name they've picked - two proxies to mimic tor.
It’d be easier to use Cloudflare WARP command line client for the same purpose.
Apple uses Cloudflare for their private relay so there’s a chance that these IPs won’t be blocked.
Apple uses Cloudflare for their private relay so there’s a chance that these IPs won’t be blocked.
Ironically, Cloudflare is selling both protection against scraping and tools to facilitate it.
If I remember correctly, Cloudflare WARP forwards your client IP in the header. So it probably won't be useful for scraping.
That's correct. More detail here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21070828
Really? I read that mmproxy can't be applied to general 3rd party websites.
When you order/cancel DigitalOcean instances, the IPs of new instances will be reused from recently cancelled.
So, you will not get many IPs this way.
So, you will not get many IPs this way.
I wonder if there's some internal APIs the cloud providers share to let them know when customers release ownership of an IP so that its reputation can be reset.
I have a webshare.io subscription for stuff like this, it's something extremely negligible like $3/mo. for 100 addresses and some liberal bandwidth cap. Always happy to self-build, but sometimes it just doesn't make any sense
[deleted]
I’ve wanted to build something similar with Lambda. I ran an experiment recently and there is pretty good distribution of IP space on AWS Lambda… you could fan out to 20+ pretty easily.
https://www.scrapingbee.com/ does this as a service + a headless browser.
If your scraper behaves, perhaps it would not be blocked…
Not really, most popular websites block any requests coming from curl
Unpopular opinion around here, but scraping Web pages is often unethical, and the scourge of many Web developers and infrastructure managers.
For Christ sakes people, develop your own products!
If you have to develop and use a cloud based tool to "get around" businesses blocking your scraping app, maybe reevaluate your business and life choices.
For Christ sakes people, develop your own products!
If you have to develop and use a cloud based tool to "get around" businesses blocking your scraping app, maybe reevaluate your business and life choices.
Sure, let me just develop my own monopoly on all real estate information.
no business is under any obligation to provide you access to their data and services for you to build a business on top of.
If you feel that the owner of data or services maintains an illegal monopoly over that data, work to lobby government to resolve that issue.
It's not your individual place to unilaterally decide that a business owes you anything other than what is described in their terms and conditions of use. Period.
If you feel that the owner of data or services maintains an illegal monopoly over that data, work to lobby government to resolve that issue.
It's not your individual place to unilaterally decide that a business owes you anything other than what is described in their terms and conditions of use. Period.
I used to have a similar attitude - most typically applied to rules & laws, etc. “If you don’t like the rule, go run for office and get the law changed.”
But then I realized that’s just a cop out. A lot of structures and systems are in place specifically to make it difficult for people to change things and specifically to maintain monopolies.
Nobody’s going to lobby government to resolve this issue. That’s the point. Real estate companies are super happy to keep the status quo.
Sometimes you have to break some rules to innovate. There is a line of course (where you draw it depends on your own ethical code). But I certainly wouldn’t put “scraping real estate data” behind the line.
But then I realized that’s just a cop out. A lot of structures and systems are in place specifically to make it difficult for people to change things and specifically to maintain monopolies.
Nobody’s going to lobby government to resolve this issue. That’s the point. Real estate companies are super happy to keep the status quo.
Sometimes you have to break some rules to innovate. There is a line of course (where you draw it depends on your own ethical code). But I certainly wouldn’t put “scraping real estate data” behind the line.
In the analog age, imagine someone made a card index of some interesting data you can come in a shop to consult, for a fee.
Would breaking into their premises to steal or copy the cards be on the same side of the line as the digital variant?
Would breaking into their premises to steal or copy the cards be on the same side of the line as the digital variant?
Scraping a website in your analog analogy would be a store where those index cards would be plastered to the shop’s windows, visible from the outside. The “scraper” would come by every day and manually copy (as in, write in their own notebook) what was on those index cards that are visible from the street.
So the question is: would you consider that stealing?
So the question is: would you consider that stealing?
It's more like you going to the public library to borrow every single book they have. Thereby forcing the library staff to handle all your requests. You would probably not expect to be allowed to do this in real life.
Good point! There is an increased pressure on a public service. Hadn’t thought about that parameter.
Except its aprivate service.
Stop trying to lawyer this through analigies people, think about the actual situation at hand, instead of drawing broken parallels to some hypothetical
Stop trying to lawyer this through analigies people, think about the actual situation at hand, instead of drawing broken parallels to some hypothetical
> no business is under any obligation to provide you access to their data and services for you to build a business on top of.
I mean, they're the ones who gave it to me, I'm just using it. Not my problem if they don't like it. I never saw any terms and conditions when my browser loaded the page, no reason I'm going to go looking for them before I scrape it. I have just as much right to access it as my web browser does or my phone does.
I'm not saying they owe me anything, they're offering it to me, I'm just taking it.
I mean, they're the ones who gave it to me, I'm just using it. Not my problem if they don't like it. I never saw any terms and conditions when my browser loaded the page, no reason I'm going to go looking for them before I scrape it. I have just as much right to access it as my web browser does or my phone does.
I'm not saying they owe me anything, they're offering it to me, I'm just taking it.
I'm not saying they owe me anything, they're offering it to me, I'm just taking it.
No you are not. If you are deploying proxy containered services on cloud computing hosts orchestrated by yourself to circumvent mechanisms to prevent such behavior you are delibertly and unethically acting in a manner directly not intended by the owner of such data.
No you are not. If you are deploying proxy containered services on cloud computing hosts orchestrated by yourself to circumvent mechanisms to prevent such behavior you are delibertly and unethically acting in a manner directly not intended by the owner of such data.
How so? They're still offering it to me, just on a different IP. I fail to see how that becomes unethical. I'm accessing information they publish to the public at large.
Or if you don't want info public, don't make it public then complain people are using it. If you want to stop scrapers, offer an api. Nobody scrapes by choice if there's a supported alternative to getting the same data.
Users are also victims: captcha walls are basically an anti-scrapper countermeasure, which everybody pays for in reduced web usability.
"Proof of work" style countermeasures (where data has to be decoded browser-side in expensive ways that are bearable for a regular user but onerous for a mass scraper) is another externality everybody pays for (the total amount of CPU wasted by regular users is at the system level a total waste).
Login walls...
"Proof of work" style countermeasures (where data has to be decoded browser-side in expensive ways that are bearable for a regular user but onerous for a mass scraper) is another externality everybody pays for (the total amount of CPU wasted by regular users is at the system level a total waste).
Login walls...
Most use cases for web scraping is usually related to data analysis, creating machine learning dataset, etc. Google and other search engine services are scraping the web too.
i tend to use tor network as a proxy which enables me to request a new ip whenever i need
Tor has a couple of hundred exit nodes and they are all on public lists, the Tor network is easy to identify and block.
If you are in a position were you need a rotating list of proxy servers in the cloud to scrape, Tor is probably way too slow.
If you are in a position were you need a rotating list of proxy servers in the cloud to scrape, Tor is probably way too slow.
quite slow and often blacklisted (by Cloudflare for example)
with parallelization you can come up to speed - on big machine with several cores may be still cheaper than many cloud instances
of course no option if your 'target' blocks tor ips
of course no option if your 'target' blocks tor ips
Maybe it’s a better idea to start or subscribe to an ethical scraping initiative with some user agent header that references some kind of policy and verifiable membership id
I think it's a pretty safe assumption that if everyone started scraping with certain headers almost every website will blanket block those headers.
That's the existing default: if a service doesn't mind scraping, they need not take any countermeasure (other than simple rate limiting with a clear status code). Any site that does go beyond that is telling data thieves that they're not welcome.
Naive
I've had some success in scraping lately with a similar project called FlareSolverr(1).
It's purpose it to get you access to sites which won't let you crawl unless you are using a real browser (e.g amazon, instagram). It doesn't hide your IP but uses puppeteer with stealth mode to get you access to otherwise restricted urls.
(1) https://github.com/FlareSolverr/FlareSolverr