Tesla ranks almost dead-last on Consumer Reports reliability list(sfgate.com)
sfgate.com
Tesla ranks almost dead-last on Consumer Reports reliability list
https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/Tesla-ranks-almost-dead-last-Consumer-Reports-16632996.php
125 comments
I am sorry but this is incredibly misleading. Just because there are a few cosmetic issues in manufacturing doesn't mean it is not a reliable vehicle. I own two, Model Y and Model 3, and they are the best and most reliable vehicles I have ever owned.
Your sample size is 2. Their sample size is 369,000.
I also have a model 3, and a number of coworkers with them. Nobody has reported any major issues. Panel gap, poor paint, maybe some initial delivery issues like chipped glass, but no major problems. They’re fantastic cars, which I’d happily buy again. If I had one complaint - give me a standard windshield wiper knob on a stock, not software (which surprisingly is getting better).
Pretty sure they said the same thing when Apple started producing phones.
(All other similarities purely coincidental).
(All other similarities purely coincidental).
Reliability for a $1k touch screen phone expected to be obviated by new technology in a couple years (back in 2007 to 2012) is of different importance than reliability for a $30k+ vehicle competing with other vehicles that do their job for 20+ years and 300k+ miles.
[deleted]
Ford is worth $60billion, Tesla $1 trillion. Tesla is doing a better job than Ford.
When the Tesla scam finally folds, it could be the end of Silicon Valley.
Also coupled with the potential sentence of Elizabeth Holmes
Also coupled with the potential sentence of Elizabeth Holmes
You realize that Tesla is moving their headquarters to Austin, is worth 1.1 Trillion dollars, outsells all of their competitors combined in certain categories, Silicon Valley is just a label given to a certain area and can't "end" and Theranos is already a failed company right?
What you are saying seems more like a line out of a comic book than something that has matches reality in any way.
What you are saying seems more like a line out of a comic book than something that has matches reality in any way.
> is worth 1.1 Trillion dollars
That's the reason why it's a systemic risk. When the financial value of something and the real value diverge so much...people rage will mount when inevitably the financial value collapses back to the real value.
People wanted Ballmer's head for keeping things together and allow the real value of Microsoft to catch up with the financial value which was so elevated at the height of the dot com bubble.
People have really strong emotions when it comes to their money, if they were raging at Ballmer because the MSFT stock stayed flat after a huge bubble (while all the other tech stock crashed and burned) , I can only imagine what will happen when Tesla implodes.
> certain area and can't "end"
The dream of Japan becoming a technological powerhouse essentially ended with the Japan stock market bust in the late 90s.
So yes, geographical areas characterized by irrational exhuberance can end, when things go south.
That's the reason why it's a systemic risk. When the financial value of something and the real value diverge so much...people rage will mount when inevitably the financial value collapses back to the real value.
People wanted Ballmer's head for keeping things together and allow the real value of Microsoft to catch up with the financial value which was so elevated at the height of the dot com bubble.
People have really strong emotions when it comes to their money, if they were raging at Ballmer because the MSFT stock stayed flat after a huge bubble (while all the other tech stock crashed and burned) , I can only imagine what will happen when Tesla implodes.
> certain area and can't "end"
The dream of Japan becoming a technological powerhouse essentially ended with the Japan stock market bust in the late 90s.
So yes, geographical areas characterized by irrational exhuberance can end, when things go south.
You said it was a scam and now instead of actually explaining that hyperbolic statement you are ignoring it and now saying "system risk" and throwing in irrelevant nonsense.
Tesla isn't going anywhere whether you like them or not and they aren't even staying in silicon valley. Saying they are a scam is nonsense and saying silicon valley will "end" is nonsense.
Tesla isn't going anywhere whether you like them or not and they aren't even staying in silicon valley. Saying they are a scam is nonsense and saying silicon valley will "end" is nonsense.
> You said it was a scam and now instead of actually explaining that hyperbolic statement you are ignoring it and now saying "system risk" and throwing in irrelevant nonsense.
It's your 101 financial scam where the CEO aims to divorce his net worth from the real life impact of the company he is at the helm of.
Again he's doing so using your 101 deceit techniques such as empty promises, constant stock pumping, cult of personality and UsvThem mentality and creative accounting.
It's Enron all over again.
It's your 101 financial scam where the CEO aims to divorce his net worth from the real life impact of the company he is at the helm of.
Again he's doing so using your 101 deceit techniques such as empty promises, constant stock pumping, cult of personality and UsvThem mentality and creative accounting.
It's Enron all over again.
That's not a scam, that's you being upset at Tesla's stock price. You said Tesla would fold and silicon valley would end and what you really meant was "I'm frustrated with people buying into hype on twitter".
This seems like the same old pattern of being hyperbolic to get attention, then walking everything back or ignoring what you actually said once someone replies to you.
This seems like the same old pattern of being hyperbolic to get attention, then walking everything back or ignoring what you actually said once someone replies to you.
> That's not a scam
It's a scam. Tesla FSD/Autopilot or whatever they call it is the same thing as Theranos blood test.
On top of that you have some other 10-15 avenues of crime, including the creative accounting , the constant lying , the securities fraud, the violent threats to whistleblowers, the rampant drug usage on the factory floor..shall I continue?
It's a scam. Tesla FSD/Autopilot or whatever they call it is the same thing as Theranos blood test.
On top of that you have some other 10-15 avenues of crime, including the creative accounting , the constant lying , the securities fraud, the violent threats to whistleblowers, the rampant drug usage on the factory floor..shall I continue?
A scam would be if people gave them money and didn't get a car in return because there never was a car.
This is an unsourced list you repeat out of frustration. A public company valued way above what people can explain with hard assets is not the definition of a scam.
Also you didn't explain why it would be the "end" of silicon valley even though they are already moving to austin.
This is an unsourced list you repeat out of frustration. A public company valued way above what people can explain with hard assets is not the definition of a scam.
Also you didn't explain why it would be the "end" of silicon valley even though they are already moving to austin.
> Tesla ... is worth 1.1 Trillion dollars
Well that's just it, isn't it? Their book value is closer to 0.027 Trillion dollars. Beyond that is faith. The value of a thing is worth what someone's willing to pay for it, and that willingness changes.
Well that's just it, isn't it? Their book value is closer to 0.027 Trillion dollars. Beyond that is faith. The value of a thing is worth what someone's willing to pay for it, and that willingness changes.
Tesla's market cap is 1.1 Trillion dollars.
https://www.google.com/finance/quote/TSLA:NASDAQ
You can debate the rest with other people, I'm talking about the current state of reality.
https://www.google.com/finance/quote/TSLA:NASDAQ
You can debate the rest with other people, I'm talking about the current state of reality.
Market cap and the stock are tesla most successful products.
1.1T for a brand which represent 1/200th of the cars in the US.
Globally they are something like 1/1000th .
This is a scam.
1.1T for a brand which represent 1/200th of the cars in the US.
Globally they are something like 1/1000th .
This is a scam.
That is you frustrated with what people are paying on the open market. Nothing stops you from shorting the stock and in fact many sharp people have, with varying success.
Again, that's not what a scam is and it has nothing to do with the 'end' of silicon valley.
Again, that's not what a scam is and it has nothing to do with the 'end' of silicon valley.
> Again, that's not what a scam is and it has nothing to do with the 'end' of silicon valley.
The free market has rules in place to punish fraudsters and promoters.
But because tesla is seen as "green" all those things are on hold for Musk.
Much like they were on hold for Holmes who was the golden girl who'd revolutionize our health.
> Again, that's not what a scam is and it has nothing to do with the 'end' of silicon valley.
Both Holmes and Musk would have never been funded on the East Coast.
They'd have been advised to check into a clinic to get rid of their drug habits, go to therapy to solve their personal issues and maybe they'd have gotten a 25k investment.
The free market has rules in place to punish fraudsters and promoters.
But because tesla is seen as "green" all those things are on hold for Musk.
Much like they were on hold for Holmes who was the golden girl who'd revolutionize our health.
> Again, that's not what a scam is and it has nothing to do with the 'end' of silicon valley.
Both Holmes and Musk would have never been funded on the East Coast.
They'd have been advised to check into a clinic to get rid of their drug habits, go to therapy to solve their personal issues and maybe they'd have gotten a 25k investment.
Nothing you have said has been based in reality. You haven't given any sources for what you said or reasons for your predictions. It's obvious this is just a motivated rant from your frustrations with tesla's stock price, silicon valley and who knows what else.
For you reality is only about the price of the stock.
By the same token you'd have thought that Amazon was the best thing since sliced bread back in 1999
Then when it crashed 97% you'd have thought it was on its deathbed ready to be cannibalized by Barnes&Noble
Then when it reached new peaks after 2010 up to now...right back up there being the best thing since sliced bread.
In reality the analysis of the balance sheets through the years + Bezos letters to investors point out to a much more nuanced and steady climb, independent of stock price action. Amazon didn't need to look at stock price at all ,because it achieved its growth via internally produced FCF and the re-investment of it.
FCF which Tesla never produced and so they decided to create a cult to oversell overhyped equity to disciples/bigger fools who trade based on sentiment and without understanding any fundamentals.
Finally if you can't see any evidence in a carmaker with quality issues trading at 310 times earnings, then you won't accept any other evidence (which btw I provided)
By the same token you'd have thought that Amazon was the best thing since sliced bread back in 1999
Then when it crashed 97% you'd have thought it was on its deathbed ready to be cannibalized by Barnes&Noble
Then when it reached new peaks after 2010 up to now...right back up there being the best thing since sliced bread.
In reality the analysis of the balance sheets through the years + Bezos letters to investors point out to a much more nuanced and steady climb, independent of stock price action. Amazon didn't need to look at stock price at all ,because it achieved its growth via internally produced FCF and the re-investment of it.
FCF which Tesla never produced and so they decided to create a cult to oversell overhyped equity to disciples/bigger fools who trade based on sentiment and without understanding any fundamentals.
Finally if you can't see any evidence in a carmaker with quality issues trading at 310 times earnings, then you won't accept any other evidence (which btw I provided)
You are so frustrated you are thinking this is a some sort of 'tesla good / tesla bad' argument where you can vent and throw out unsourced claims. All I've said from the beginning is what tesla's market cap is right now and that it is not a scam no matter how upset you are about it. Just admit that your claims were hyperbolic.
Scam? Tesla is manufacturing and delivering vehicles.
The model Y is by all accounts the best vehicle they've made and so far doesn't have any of the problems seen with others.
FWIW ours arrived in perfect condition and hasn't needed service.
The model Y is by all accounts the best vehicle they've made and so far doesn't have any of the problems seen with others.
FWIW ours arrived in perfect condition and hasn't needed service.
> Scam? Tesla is manufacturing and delivering vehicles.
Enron sold products and services as well. Matter of fact they posted a record 100B revenues, back in the 90s which is even more impressive because even a billion was a lot of money back then.
Doesn't mean it wasn't a financial scam engineered by the CEO to enrich himself.
Enron sold products and services as well. Matter of fact they posted a record 100B revenues, back in the 90s which is even more impressive because even a billion was a lot of money back then.
Doesn't mean it wasn't a financial scam engineered by the CEO to enrich himself.
> Much of it has to do with the overall instability of electric vehicles in general — especially SUVs
I thought electric vehicles were more 'stable'? Or am I misunderstanding that? They're mostly solid state. What's unstable?
And why are SUVs even less stable?
I thought electric vehicles were more 'stable'? Or am I misunderstanding that? They're mostly solid state. What's unstable?
And why are SUVs even less stable?
I have a 2017 Model X that I bought new. The EV part is great, its everything else that sucks. Since I've had it, I've taken it for service for the following:
o Arrived w/o Tow pkg (Tesla "forgot" it, was installed via service center appt)
o falcon wing doors improperly adjusted, leading to wind noise and water intrusion
o Loud wind noise and fogging passenger side windows: Due to improperly installed "triangle" window on passenger door
o Worn half shafts caused shudder under acceleration, replaced at ~20k miles
o fogging drivers side A pillar camera after rain, leading to "navigate on autopilot unavailable"
o Drove in "low" mode to preserve half shafts, caused excessive tire wear. Wore inner rear tires down to a puncture around 30k miles. Replaced tires and had car re-aligned to run in "low" mode.
o Half shafts replaced again at 38k miles
o Upper control arms shot around 39k miles, car out of warranty, and Tesla wants $1k to fix.
All in all, I'm thinking to get a different car since I need a car that works. I don't want a non-Tesla EV since the charging options for non-Tesla EVs suck. I'm currently looking at PHEVs.
o Arrived w/o Tow pkg (Tesla "forgot" it, was installed via service center appt)
o falcon wing doors improperly adjusted, leading to wind noise and water intrusion
o Loud wind noise and fogging passenger side windows: Due to improperly installed "triangle" window on passenger door
o Worn half shafts caused shudder under acceleration, replaced at ~20k miles
o fogging drivers side A pillar camera after rain, leading to "navigate on autopilot unavailable"
o Drove in "low" mode to preserve half shafts, caused excessive tire wear. Wore inner rear tires down to a puncture around 30k miles. Replaced tires and had car re-aligned to run in "low" mode.
o Half shafts replaced again at 38k miles
o Upper control arms shot around 39k miles, car out of warranty, and Tesla wants $1k to fix.
All in all, I'm thinking to get a different car since I need a car that works. I don't want a non-Tesla EV since the charging options for non-Tesla EVs suck. I'm currently looking at PHEVs.
All these seem like mechanical or assembly issues other auto manufacturers have already figured out. Very rarely hear these days about control arms failing with traditional automakers vehicles.
I've surmised for a while that it's simply impossible, sans magic, for Tesla to have supposedly surpassed other car manufacturers when those other car manufacturers have decades of experience honing their designs for reliability and quality.
I've said many times that my Kia has better quality feel than any Tesla I've been in.
I've said many times that my Kia has better quality feel than any Tesla I've been in.
What Kia do you own?
Optima SXL
If I was in the market for a new electric car, I'd definitely be considering the Kia EV6. Which supports the point I've made before that I seriously doubt Tesla can compete with other manufacturers' ability to spin up reliable and quality new models.
If I was in the market for a new electric car, I'd definitely be considering the Kia EV6. Which supports the point I've made before that I seriously doubt Tesla can compete with other manufacturers' ability to spin up reliable and quality new models.
I sold my 2020 Model X because of the half shafts (wtf are those) issue. It’s a complete design flaw and it’ll never stop degrading and requiring a new repair. Even had that confirmed by the service center. Newest Model X design supposedly fixes that. Maybe Tesla will get sued over it idk. With the pandemic the prices for used Tesla’s is through the stratosphere and although I sold too early I drove the MX for 9 months before selling it for what I paid for it. Had unlimited free Supercharging too… :/
My advice: get out while you can and the prices are so high.
We are working from home so just drive a Model 3. Waiting on a Model Y and will sell the 3. Great cars though.
My advice: get out while you can and the prices are so high.
We are working from home so just drive a Model 3. Waiting on a Model Y and will sell the 3. Great cars though.
Half-shafts exist on (almost) every vehicle. They’re also called CV-Axles, essentially they allow independent suspension travel with wheels, traditional axles are stiff and carry wheel movement to the opposite side.
I have a ‘99 Isuzu Rodeo that I spent a weekend replacing a half-shaft two years ago.
I have a ‘99 Isuzu Rodeo that I spent a weekend replacing a half-shaft two years ago.
What modern cars don’t have half-shafts? You get wheels hanging in the air and no traction with full-shafts.
Sorry, I didn't mean to suggest they aren't a critical component, just had no idea what they are/were. I'm more of a "does this thing turn on? Cool" kind of car guy.
Model X is just a badly designed car, it needs to be taken out to the back and shot.
But I feel it just earns them too much money from the people trying to show off the dancing falcon doors to scrap it.
But I feel it just earns them too much money from the people trying to show off the dancing falcon doors to scrap it.
They need the Model X, because the squat, flat 'sedan' body style of all their other cars seems very out of date these days. They do it for air resistance I think, but most people want a much more upright car.
> the squat, flat 'sedan' body style of all their other cars seems very out of date these days
In the non american world, where "trucks" are not a daily commuter, a sedan is not out of date. Nor is a hatchback, nor is a ferrari. The family wagon, truck and hybrid truck/suv have been an out of date style for the last 50 years in the developed world.
In the non american world, where "trucks" are not a daily commuter, a sedan is not out of date. Nor is a hatchback, nor is a ferrari. The family wagon, truck and hybrid truck/suv have been an out of date style for the last 50 years in the developed world.
SUVs have not been around for 50 years …
But they have!
The Ford Bronco was introduced in 1965. The Jeep Cherokee arrived in 1974. I remember seeing a lot of them as a kid, though if I had to pinpoint the start of the SUV craze, it would probably be closer to 1990 when the Ford Explorer first came to market.
The Ford Bronco was introduced in 1965. The Jeep Cherokee arrived in 1974. I remember seeing a lot of them as a kid, though if I had to pinpoint the start of the SUV craze, it would probably be closer to 1990 when the Ford Explorer first came to market.
Sure they have. Chevy Blazer and Ford Bronco came out in the late 60s.
Wow, you’re right! I had no idea. Thanks. 1965 Ford Bronco: https://images.app.goo.gl/P4seF3jQfQfs69oL9
the person you are replying to never said otherwise
"SUV" is a marketting term that came into common use in the 80's in America.
There is no commonly agreed-upon definition of an SUV, and usage of the term varies between countries. Thus, it is "a loose term that traditionally covers a broad range of vehicles with four-wheel drive."
As such I am happy to claim, given there is no formal definition of what is and what isnt an SUV; that they dont exist at all, if only wishing made it so.
If one wants to claim they do indeed exist - there are plenty of examples from the 1940s and 1950's. “Sport utility vehicle” appeared for the first time in 1974 in the brochure of the first-generation Cherokee. So by the measure of marketing material, they have not been around 50 years, they have been around 47 years.
There is no commonly agreed-upon definition of an SUV, and usage of the term varies between countries. Thus, it is "a loose term that traditionally covers a broad range of vehicles with four-wheel drive."
As such I am happy to claim, given there is no formal definition of what is and what isnt an SUV; that they dont exist at all, if only wishing made it so.
If one wants to claim they do indeed exist - there are plenty of examples from the 1940s and 1950's. “Sport utility vehicle” appeared for the first time in 1974 in the brochure of the first-generation Cherokee. So by the measure of marketing material, they have not been around 50 years, they have been around 47 years.
What do you mean by out of date then? They're the best selling form-factor in many countries aren't they?
And it's not a US thing - the Germans, French, and British are also more and more switching their focus to the SUV form-factor.
And it's not a US thing - the Germans, French, and British are also more and more switching their focus to the SUV form-factor.
> They're the best selling form-factor in many countries aren't they?
Even allowing for the massive definition creep that basically every car where the bonnet / windscreen angle is shallow being an SUV. No - around 30% would be my best guess.
Even allowing for the massive definition creep that basically every car where the bonnet / windscreen angle is shallow being an SUV. No - around 30% would be my best guess.
I think for definition what people really care about in practice, even if they don't know it, is it a car they have to crouch down into, or can they simply sit into it. Most people don't like those flat cars that you stoop down into anymore.
I think Ford, that massive iconic US car brand, have discontinued all sedans in the US now, since they're so unpopular.
I think Ford, that massive iconic US car brand, have discontinued all sedans in the US now, since they're so unpopular.
they said "truck/suv", not "suv"
pretty sure members of ((the set "truck") + (the set "suv")) have existed for more than 50 years, because that union includes trucks
pretty sure members of ((the set "truck") + (the set "suv")) have existed for more than 50 years, because that union includes trucks
Hmm, I must had misunderstood then, my bad. When they said trucks and SUVs have been out of style for 50 years … that to me implied that they were around 50 years ago (how can something that doesn’t exist go out of style? :))
It seems the root of the misunderstanding is interpreting the slash (/) as "and", when it really means "and/or", in this case, or
> suv have been an out of date style for the last 50 years
I guess people just want to sit high. SUVs waste a lot of vertical space on a raised floor. Really bad for driving dynamics, but hey, you sit high.
Yeah, I'm going to be looking for a new car in 2-3 years probably, but I have absolutely zero interest in SUVs and crossovers, so the market is looking more and more dire every year.
If I need an electric (most likely), and unless my finances improve sharply to include luxury models, I will probably be able to count my options on one hand.
If I need an electric (most likely), and unless my finances improve sharply to include luxury models, I will probably be able to count my options on one hand.
Clearly you don’t understand what disruption means. For Tesla it means rediscovering and reinventing everything about making reliable automobiles profitably, because those old legacy companies just can’t innovate. And it means keeping the sails full with lots of hot air and hype. Tesla has futuristic robot factories, don’t you know? What other manufacturer innovated with a huge touchscreen glued to the dash?
Please say more about the "charging options for non-Tesla EVs suck." Is that all about superchargers or is there more to it?
I don’t have an electric car but my parents have an electric non-Tesla one, and say that firstly you have to sign up to accounts with loads of different companies just to use them, and then secondly it’s really common to arrive at one and it just doesn’t work or there is only a few and charge points which are full.
Teslas currently have the advantage of the extra supercharge network, although in the Uk that is being opened to other electric cars which will level the playing field.
Teslas currently have the advantage of the extra supercharge network, although in the Uk that is being opened to other electric cars which will level the playing field.
My impression, from watching many videos similar to this: https://youtu.be/jGjUQuXozYc, is that fast charging in the USA is incredibly flaky for non-Tesla vehicles. Chargers don't work at all, chargers don't accept payment, chargers don't handshake with cars, chargers complain of faults and don't finish charging the car, chargers don't deliver advertised charging power/speed.
I've done about 20k miles in road trips in my Tesla, and I think I've plugged in to 1 charger that didn't work at all. I've suffered degraded speed at other chargers, primarily due to them being older chargers that share capacity between 2 chargers (so my speed was halved when somebody else plugged in to the mated charger).
The worst problem I've had with Tesla chargers is the locations. Sometimes finding them is hard (the one near Dulles in Reston took me forever to find for example), sometimes getting to them is hard (chargers in malls are a nightmare around the holidays).
I've done about 20k miles in road trips in my Tesla, and I think I've plugged in to 1 charger that didn't work at all. I've suffered degraded speed at other chargers, primarily due to them being older chargers that share capacity between 2 chargers (so my speed was halved when somebody else plugged in to the mated charger).
The worst problem I've had with Tesla chargers is the locations. Sometimes finding them is hard (the one near Dulles in Reston took me forever to find for example), sometimes getting to them is hard (chargers in malls are a nightmare around the holidays).
Here's an example of my crappy charging experience.
I live in a large town, population about 60K, and the ChargePoint app shows these options near me right now. This includes ALL charging networks, but only J1772 plugs that fit my car:
16 "public" ports are in the area:
- 4 are actually inside an apartment complex
- 2 are at Whole Foods, but I know 1 has been broken for years.
- 2 are BEHIND car dealerships. That's not really public.
- 3 are at someone's house?
- 2 are at the gym, but 1 has been broken for years.
- 2 are at a high school. I don't spend time there.
- 1 is at the library, and it's always occupied or broken.
If I expand the search to other places I shop:
- 2 ports are at the mall, but 1 of them is broken, and because they're close to the entrance, they're often ICEd.
Thankfully, I drive a PHEV so I can charge at home overnight, and burn gas for long distances. To date, 75% of this car's miles were electric.
I live in a large town, population about 60K, and the ChargePoint app shows these options near me right now. This includes ALL charging networks, but only J1772 plugs that fit my car:
16 "public" ports are in the area:
- 4 are actually inside an apartment complex
- 2 are at Whole Foods, but I know 1 has been broken for years.
- 2 are BEHIND car dealerships. That's not really public.
- 3 are at someone's house?
- 2 are at the gym, but 1 has been broken for years.
- 2 are at a high school. I don't spend time there.
- 1 is at the library, and it's always occupied or broken.
If I expand the search to other places I shop:
- 2 ports are at the mall, but 1 of them is broken, and because they're close to the entrance, they're often ICEd.
Thankfully, I drive a PHEV so I can charge at home overnight, and burn gas for long distances. To date, 75% of this car's miles were electric.
If you have a non-Tesla EV you’re really reliant on finding some wall to plug in to. If you are just driving around town, cool you’re good to go and you just go home. If you’re taking a trip for a few hours then you need to charge and that’s where you run into trouble. With Tesla there’s all the Superchargers so that few hour trip is fine with a quick 20 minute charge. For other EVs it’s a few hours at best.
This will be a solved problem in the future though. Just growing pains.
This will be a solved problem in the future though. Just growing pains.
> For other EVs it’s a few hours at best.
Absolutely not true. This is one of those things Tesla diehards keep repeating as if it was 2015 still. You have commercial super-chargers widely available already that can charge a car 80% in 20 minutes: https://youtu.be/ZgeZikh88Wc?t=776
Absolutely not true. This is one of those things Tesla diehards keep repeating as if it was 2015 still. You have commercial super-chargers widely available already that can charge a car 80% in 20 minutes: https://youtu.be/ZgeZikh88Wc?t=776
I’ll check that out but as an EV owner over the course of a few years even the Supercharger network isn’t widespread enough. So I’m not ready to buy that there is an alternative that’s as good as that network already. This looks more like the “see you can drive from LA to NYC” road-trip stuff from the early Tesla days.
Things will expand for sure and I’m happy about it, but this looks like marketing to me.
You own and drive an EV I take it? What’s your experience been like?
Things will expand for sure and I’m happy about it, but this looks like marketing to me.
You own and drive an EV I take it? What’s your experience been like?
From that video, I assume you're in the UK.
In the USA, it is still 2015 basically. Everything I've seen on charging non-Tesla EVs in the USA makes it seem like its a total dumpster fire. One of the YT's I watch has experiences like this all the time: https://youtu.be/jGjUQuXozYc?t=862
In the USA, it is still 2015 basically. Everything I've seen on charging non-Tesla EVs in the USA makes it seem like its a total dumpster fire. One of the YT's I watch has experiences like this all the time: https://youtu.be/jGjUQuXozYc?t=862
These folks had issues charging their Porsche Taycan on their road trip in 2021. Also it looks like charging on a road trip looks like a Tour de Walmart for the most part.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTieOdnDhX8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTieOdnDhX8
No worse than the Tour de Meijer I've been on with the Supercharging network lol.
At least Meijer has a small bourbon selection so I can try and find a bottle of Buffalo Trace from time to time.
At least Meijer has a small bourbon selection so I can try and find a bottle of Buffalo Trace from time to time.
This sounds awful. Are things any better with more recent model years? IDK when the X came out, but a 2017 was probably pretty early, right?
I am interested in an itemized total cost of ownership. This sounds like a pretty incredible experience for an electric car. I don't think I paid more than $140 in synthetic oil and filter changes since I purchased my gas only Toyota new 50,000 miles ago and that's my only expense so far besides gas.
Cost per mile on a Toyota, including fuel, regular maintenance, insurance, depreciation, etc is most certainly much lower than Tesla.
What I am curious about is if fuel prices flatten or become cheaper, will people still keep flicking to electric vehicles?
What I am curious about is if fuel prices flatten or become cheaper, will people still keep flicking to electric vehicles?
[deleted]
It's bizarre that the car is out of warranty already at only four years. Have they driven it 100k miles or something?
Most cars in the US have 3-4yr "bumper-to-bumper" warranty and 5-6yr for powertrain. Tesla has 8yr only for battery/drive unit. Warranty for the rest of the car runs out at 4yr or 50k miles (plan to replace S door handles [although less so] & air suspension for S/X). Luckily 3/Y don't have air suspension or fancy doors/handles.
It has 39K miles on it. The warranty for the "misc" stuff that breaks is 4 years, 50K miles. I'm just past the 4 year mark.
[deleted]
I don't see it as a comment on the energy source or even drivetrain.
From the article:
> The issue, Consumer Reports’ Fisher told CNBC, is that the company has the tendency to “add so much tech that is not necessary.” And while this makes for a product that varies wildly from year to year, it is part of the Tesla brand that enthusiasts adore.
From the linked Reuters article:
> Electric vehicle drive systems, or powertrains, are not the main source of problems, Fisher said. The issues reported by owners are with other features.
> Manufacturers "are using EVs as a technological test bed," Fisher said. "Those are the things that go wrong."
From the article:
> The issue, Consumer Reports’ Fisher told CNBC, is that the company has the tendency to “add so much tech that is not necessary.” And while this makes for a product that varies wildly from year to year, it is part of the Tesla brand that enthusiasts adore.
From the linked Reuters article:
> Electric vehicle drive systems, or powertrains, are not the main source of problems, Fisher said. The issues reported by owners are with other features.
> Manufacturers "are using EVs as a technological test bed," Fisher said. "Those are the things that go wrong."
The quoted Reuters piece references reliability, not instability.
"Electric SUVs as a vehicle category is the absolute bottom in terms of reliability," Consumer Reports director of vehicle testing Jake Fisher said Thursday during a presentation to the Detroit Automotive Press Association.
https://www.reuters.com/markets/asia/tesla-electric-suvs-get...
There's no reference at all to instability in the article.
I suspect a transcription error on the part of SFGate and Joshua Bote.
"Electric SUVs as a vehicle category is the absolute bottom in terms of reliability," Consumer Reports director of vehicle testing Jake Fisher said Thursday during a presentation to the Detroit Automotive Press Association.
https://www.reuters.com/markets/asia/tesla-electric-suvs-get...
There's no reference at all to instability in the article.
I suspect a transcription error on the part of SFGate and Joshua Bote.
I think it's poor word choice from the author, not a transcription error. The article refers to 'stability' a second time at the end of article as well:
As a result, it makes sense that even though Tesla and Lincoln are the lowest-ranked in terms of reliability, they continue to fare well among its buyers and rank high on its customer satisfaction index — proof that buyers may value brand loyalty and innovation over stability.
I believe 'stability' here refers to "an overall pattern of reliability", and not describing road handling. If the author wanted to use another word, perhaps 'dependability' would better than 'stability'.
As a result, it makes sense that even though Tesla and Lincoln are the lowest-ranked in terms of reliability, they continue to fare well among its buyers and rank high on its customer satisfaction index — proof that buyers may value brand loyalty and innovation over stability.
I believe 'stability' here refers to "an overall pattern of reliability", and not describing road handling. If the author wanted to use another word, perhaps 'dependability' would better than 'stability'.
The Reuters article mentions this:
> Electric vehicle drive systems, or powertrains, are not the main source of problems, Fisher said. The issues reported by owners are with other features.
> Manufacturers "are using EVs as a technological test bed," Fisher said. "Those are the things that go wrong."
That's instability leading to poor reliability.
> Electric vehicle drive systems, or powertrains, are not the main source of problems, Fisher said. The issues reported by owners are with other features.
> Manufacturers "are using EVs as a technological test bed," Fisher said. "Those are the things that go wrong."
That's instability leading to poor reliability.
I can see that. I still don't think it's a good word choice.
If it's about the predictability of a given vehicle's projected maintenance requirements, use unreliability.
If it's about the excessive technology leading to unreliability, maybe discuss complexity.
And if it's about a quality record of the manufacturer which changes markedly over time, discuss variability or inconsistency.
But I'd expect instability in discussion of vehicle-related matters to refer to road-handling, steering, or the like. If that's the case, then discuss uneven handling. And if it's not the case, then avoid confusion (or unjustified criticism) that might be caused.
If you've got to argue for or justify the language in a mass publication, it's poor language.
If it's about the predictability of a given vehicle's projected maintenance requirements, use unreliability.
If it's about the excessive technology leading to unreliability, maybe discuss complexity.
And if it's about a quality record of the manufacturer which changes markedly over time, discuss variability or inconsistency.
But I'd expect instability in discussion of vehicle-related matters to refer to road-handling, steering, or the like. If that's the case, then discuss uneven handling. And if it's not the case, then avoid confusion (or unjustified criticism) that might be caused.
If you've got to argue for or justify the language in a mass publication, it's poor language.
I think you're right about stability being a poor term here. The term as applied in this case is actually an implicit analogy.
A "stable marriage", for example, is conceptually stable in the same way a plane or car is physically stable.
To then take that analogous usage form and re-apply it back to where the actual, original meaning makes more sense, is indeed confusing.
A "stable marriage", for example, is conceptually stable in the same way a plane or car is physically stable.
To then take that analogous usage form and re-apply it back to where the actual, original meaning makes more sense, is indeed confusing.
They have a higher center of gravity? /s
Anyone can make expensive cars in a tent factory with human robots.
But Tesla comes with crypto hype, a Twitter-addicted founder, and fanboy cult membership. If Consumer Reports had considered those factors the ratings would have turned out different.
But Tesla comes with crypto hype, a Twitter-addicted founder, and fanboy cult membership. If Consumer Reports had considered those factors the ratings would have turned out different.
Looking forward to see how Elon tweets himself out of this one.
Tesla has been near the bottom of CR reliability rankings for a while, this isn’t new. My Mazda dealership had the CR list prominently on display (with Mazda at the top last year). Musk has dismissed the CR rankings while touting Teslas’s great scores on crash tests and safety, and their sales numbers and apparent popularity.
My comment was sarcastic. I know several Tesla owners who seem very happy with their choice. Customer satisfaction seems higher than the CR rankings merit. Similarly I know people who love Jeeps, although that brand also gets low marks.
My comment was sarcastic. I know several Tesla owners who seem very happy with their choice. Customer satisfaction seems higher than the CR rankings merit. Similarly I know people who love Jeeps, although that brand also gets low marks.
CR has been compromised for a while....
You have some evidence, or just a drive by?
Tesla’s reliability and quality problems have been discussed in numerous forums, not just CR.
It’s possible that Tesla cars are actually top quality and reliable, and the company is the victim of a conspiracy with Consumer Reports paying a part to tear Tesla down. It’s also possible that Elon Musk can’t walk on water and starting up a car business from scratch is harder than it looks.
Tesla’s reliability and quality problems have been discussed in numerous forums, not just CR.
It’s possible that Tesla cars are actually top quality and reliable, and the company is the victim of a conspiracy with Consumer Reports paying a part to tear Tesla down. It’s also possible that Elon Musk can’t walk on water and starting up a car business from scratch is harder than it looks.
[deleted]
Can we change the link from SFGate to the more reliable|original source, either the cnbc/reuters article or the actual Consumer Reports blogpost? Not sure why need to have third hand info source.
https://www.consumerreports.org/car-reliability-owner-satisf...
https://www.consumerreports.org/car-reliability-owner-satisf...
On topic though, if they are so unreliable, why are do they have such high consumer satisfaction ratings?
https://www.consumerreports.org/car-reliability-owner-satisf...
Maybe I just don't understand the American car consumer market, or may there is a difference in the magnitude of measurements.
----
Also, I hear people in Europe preferring the Shanghai made cars over the Fremont made one (for having better fit and finish), may Fremont is just not fit for purpose?
The new Austin and Berlin Factories, plus the new mega-casting system, might finally give us some insight.
Seeing the battery and chip supply issues, I feel Tesla has snagged themselves another 3-5 years of lax workmanship before the alternatives simply catch upto them.
Tesla's true moat is charging infra, and that can't last long.
https://www.consumerreports.org/car-reliability-owner-satisf...
Maybe I just don't understand the American car consumer market, or may there is a difference in the magnitude of measurements.
----
Also, I hear people in Europe preferring the Shanghai made cars over the Fremont made one (for having better fit and finish), may Fremont is just not fit for purpose?
The new Austin and Berlin Factories, plus the new mega-casting system, might finally give us some insight.
Seeing the battery and chip supply issues, I feel Tesla has snagged themselves another 3-5 years of lax workmanship before the alternatives simply catch upto them.
Tesla's true moat is charging infra, and that can't last long.
Tesla isn't the only brand that has received an Excellent rating for owner satisfaction but a Poor rating for reliability from Consumer Reports surveys.
Dyson also earned the same two ratings for several of its stick vacuums in 2019:
https://www.consumerreports.org/stick-vacuums/dyson-stick-va...
Some brands just seem to command more loyalty from their customers than the quality of their products can justify.
Dyson also earned the same two ratings for several of its stick vacuums in 2019:
https://www.consumerreports.org/stick-vacuums/dyson-stick-va...
Some brands just seem to command more loyalty from their customers than the quality of their products can justify.
Failure rate isn't the only metric that affects customer satisfaction. If the product works better than any of its competition, but has a 10% rate of complete failure (which is insanely high for a retail product), you're still going to have 90% customer satisfaction.
> On topic though, if they are so unreliable, why are do they have such high consumer satisfaction ratings?
Maybe for a lot of people reliability isn't a major concern?
People who get a new car every few years even if the old one runs fine just need their car to last until then.
People like me who stick with a car much longer [1] put reliability much higher on our requirements.
[1] I'm driving a 2006 Honda CR-V that I bought new and hope to keep driving for another 15+ years, albeit at some point I plan to get an EV for my around town daily driving keeping the CR-V for when I need more cargo or longer distance. Just waiting on that for an EV that I can keep for 20+ years without it costing a fortune over that time in battery repair/replacement. I really want the next car I buy to be the last car I buy.
Maybe for a lot of people reliability isn't a major concern?
People who get a new car every few years even if the old one runs fine just need their car to last until then.
People like me who stick with a car much longer [1] put reliability much higher on our requirements.
[1] I'm driving a 2006 Honda CR-V that I bought new and hope to keep driving for another 15+ years, albeit at some point I plan to get an EV for my around town daily driving keeping the CR-V for when I need more cargo or longer distance. Just waiting on that for an EV that I can keep for 20+ years without it costing a fortune over that time in battery repair/replacement. I really want the next car I buy to be the last car I buy.
>Just waiting on that for an EV that I can keep for 20+ years without it costing a fortune over that time in battery repair/replacement.
You will live a long life for sure. :)
You will live a long life for sure. :)
Yeah...I may compromise and make that last car a PHEV. My normal daily driving is under the all electric range of most PHEVs, and since they have smaller batteries than full EVs battery repair/replacement should be cheaper.
The plan would then be a PHEV sedan mostly used just on battery, the CR-V for when I need more cargo capacity, and either the CR-V or PHEV for those rare longer trips depending on how much stuff I need to carry.
A plus for that approach is that since the PHEV would not be used much in ICE mode I hopefully would get a very long lifetime out of the ICE side of it. If I go for a PHEV SUV instead of a PHEV sedan, then I'm even covered if the CR-V dies before me.
I have hope though that as EVs become more common battery repair/replacement will come down. In particular I'm hoping multiple manufacturers standardize on using the same cells in their batteries and make the individual cells replaceable so that battery repair becomes a standard thing you can have done at a typical independent car repair shop, rather than something you have to go to the dealer for and has to be done with parts from the car manufacturer.
The plan would then be a PHEV sedan mostly used just on battery, the CR-V for when I need more cargo capacity, and either the CR-V or PHEV for those rare longer trips depending on how much stuff I need to carry.
A plus for that approach is that since the PHEV would not be used much in ICE mode I hopefully would get a very long lifetime out of the ICE side of it. If I go for a PHEV SUV instead of a PHEV sedan, then I'm even covered if the CR-V dies before me.
I have hope though that as EVs become more common battery repair/replacement will come down. In particular I'm hoping multiple manufacturers standardize on using the same cells in their batteries and make the individual cells replaceable so that battery repair becomes a standard thing you can have done at a typical independent car repair shop, rather than something you have to go to the dealer for and has to be done with parts from the car manufacturer.
> On topic though, if they are so unreliable, why are do they have such high consumer satisfaction ratings?
Because when you buy expensive toys and show them to your friends you cannot admit that they are crap ? It happens all the time.
Because when you buy expensive toys and show them to your friends you cannot admit that they are crap ? It happens all the time.
I'm still surprised there is so little backlash against going through the touchscreen for all the controls.
Lack of a dedicated on/off/volume knob for the soundsystem is such a dealbreaker for me.
Anything that adds more steps to a process is not an improvement. Maybe there is something I am missing.
The other controls that are normally on sticks on the steering column would be annoying at first but I think I might get used to that.
Anything that adds more steps to a process is not an improvement. Maybe there is something I am missing.
The other controls that are normally on sticks on the steering column would be annoying at first but I think I might get used to that.
When I first got my Model 3, I couldn't stand the touch screen.
I'm still not a fan. The UI is objectively terrible in many situations. That said, I can honestly say that it's not that big of a deal for me.
Lack of tactile feedback is a big deal though.
But, it's sort of moot. Interactions that require I be looking at the screen and carefully touching icons are typically the kinds of things I'd want to do while parked anyhow. Tinkering with settings, for example, or entering an address for navigation.
A lot of interactions you might do in a "normal" car are also reduced or eliminated. For example, I often need to adjust vents and turn knobs for climate control while driving in my "normal" car. Even though I can tell it to set the air temp to a specific value, it still needs intervention frequently to feel right.
In the Model 3, the climate control just works. If I set it to 70F, it feels like 70F. It's a thing I find myself never even thinking about.
> Lack of a dedicated on/off/volume knob for the soundsystem is such a dealbreaker for me.
The steering wheel has a scroll wheel that can control volume and pause audio. The sound system is never really off though. The car still emits warning sounds through the sound system, for example.
In practice, the scroll wheel thing has worked just fine for me. I've not tried to see what happens when the AM/FM radio is playing; I suspect "pausing" that would either do nothing or mute the audio.
Before getting used to it, the Model 3 seems comically devoid of controls, and it seems ridiculous. But with use, it start to feel totally normal. At least that's my experience.
For what it's worth, I was on the fence about Tesla for ages. I wouldn't have one now if I hadn't inherited it from a family member. I probably wouldn't buy one today, even after having grown to love the Model 3.
That said, I would jump at a much more economical version of the Model 3. One that's just an EV. It doesn't need a glass roof, heated leather seats, folding mirrors, robotic door handles, etc. It just needs to be like the cheapest Kia money can buy, except with a Tesla powertrain.
I'm still not a fan. The UI is objectively terrible in many situations. That said, I can honestly say that it's not that big of a deal for me.
Lack of tactile feedback is a big deal though.
But, it's sort of moot. Interactions that require I be looking at the screen and carefully touching icons are typically the kinds of things I'd want to do while parked anyhow. Tinkering with settings, for example, or entering an address for navigation.
A lot of interactions you might do in a "normal" car are also reduced or eliminated. For example, I often need to adjust vents and turn knobs for climate control while driving in my "normal" car. Even though I can tell it to set the air temp to a specific value, it still needs intervention frequently to feel right.
In the Model 3, the climate control just works. If I set it to 70F, it feels like 70F. It's a thing I find myself never even thinking about.
> Lack of a dedicated on/off/volume knob for the soundsystem is such a dealbreaker for me.
The steering wheel has a scroll wheel that can control volume and pause audio. The sound system is never really off though. The car still emits warning sounds through the sound system, for example.
In practice, the scroll wheel thing has worked just fine for me. I've not tried to see what happens when the AM/FM radio is playing; I suspect "pausing" that would either do nothing or mute the audio.
Before getting used to it, the Model 3 seems comically devoid of controls, and it seems ridiculous. But with use, it start to feel totally normal. At least that's my experience.
For what it's worth, I was on the fence about Tesla for ages. I wouldn't have one now if I hadn't inherited it from a family member. I probably wouldn't buy one today, even after having grown to love the Model 3.
That said, I would jump at a much more economical version of the Model 3. One that's just an EV. It doesn't need a glass roof, heated leather seats, folding mirrors, robotic door handles, etc. It just needs to be like the cheapest Kia money can buy, except with a Tesla powertrain.
But this not the grapevine; iirc they generate results from (if not anonymous then atleast not publicly shared) replies to Consumer Reports subscriber survey.
So from the entire pool of CR subscriber base who agree to reply to their annual survey and who self-report to own Teslas, this group both overwhelmingly chooses to report significant number of car issues AND chooses to report great satisfaction?
What is up with this group of people?
So from the entire pool of CR subscriber base who agree to reply to their annual survey and who self-report to own Teslas, this group both overwhelmingly chooses to report significant number of car issues AND chooses to report great satisfaction?
What is up with this group of people?
I think it's because people who buy a Tesla are fans of Tesla, so the well known reliability issues aren't a problem to them. They aren't buying a Tesla for practical reasons like affordability and reliability, they're buying a Tesla because they want to own a Tesla. It's the same as people who buy poorly made expensive designer clothes and accessories.
Helping move away from petro-powered transportation is a huge incentive for a lot of people. And it's not like Teslas are terrible or have a worse driving experience than other cars.
There is a reason that every single electric car made by anyone is sold far in advance, including non-Teslas where charging on road trips is still a sub par experience.
There is a reason that every single electric car made by anyone is sold far in advance, including non-Teslas where charging on road trips is still a sub par experience.
> Helping move away from petro-powered transportation is a huge incentive for a lot of people.
If somebody was serious about this as their primary motivator, they'd buy a much more reliable / affordable vehicle like the Bolt or Leaf.
If somebody was serious about this as their primary motivator, they'd buy a much more reliable / affordable vehicle like the Bolt or Leaf.
satisfaction is subjective, reliability is more objective: "how many times have you needed to get this car serviced in the first N years?"
what's more, the cognitive biases that lead someone to convince themselves they're satisfied with their purchase apply whether speaking to friends or a formal survey
what's more, the cognitive biases that lead someone to convince themselves they're satisfied with their purchase apply whether speaking to friends or a formal survey
Yeah, it's a reasonable explanation, the people who really gave their money for the cars are the converted/convinced/conned ones. And people hate to shatter their belief in their own sense of judgement.
Note I say it's a reasonable explanation, although I don't want to assert how accurate it is in regards to Tesla owners - someone should do the actual research.
Note I say it's a reasonable explanation, although I don't want to assert how accurate it is in regards to Tesla owners - someone should do the actual research.
why are do they have such high consumer satisfaction ratings?
Could be that the car is so good in so many other ways that people are willing to put up with a lot more minor problems. Things like the infamous misaligned panels might be annoying visually, but it doesn't affect your ability to drive the car.
Or it could be that the problems only really show up after a few years and most people voting up the Tesla are driving cars less than, say 3-5 years old.
Beyond that it seems to be one extremely unreliable model really dragging down the overall score. If all the other models are OK on reliability and great in every other respect then that can also explain the discrepancy.
Could be that the car is so good in so many other ways that people are willing to put up with a lot more minor problems. Things like the infamous misaligned panels might be annoying visually, but it doesn't affect your ability to drive the car.
Or it could be that the problems only really show up after a few years and most people voting up the Tesla are driving cars less than, say 3-5 years old.
Beyond that it seems to be one extremely unreliable model really dragging down the overall score. If all the other models are OK on reliability and great in every other respect then that can also explain the discrepancy.
Let's see how well Berlin is going to go when Elon finds out about German unions. German workers are not going to accept the slave level work conditions that are common in the US.
Thanks for the source!
I was trying to find that list with no luck.
Email your suggestion to [email protected]
Include the submission URL and your suggested disambiguated link.
Include the submission URL and your suggested disambiguated link.
Interesting, going off the Consumers Report site, if Telsa only made the Model 3, then they'd be 11th on the list and just one point behind Mini. It just seems every other model will break apart in a stiff wind.
https://www.consumerreports.org/car-reliability-owner-satisf...
(You have to click on 'Tesla' to see the breakdown)
https://www.consumerreports.org/car-reliability-owner-satisf...
(You have to click on 'Tesla' to see the breakdown)
Here's a fun fact about the Model 3: the interior design is so incompetent, you can destroy the window if you open a door "wrong."
https://youtu.be/14ZYknJQ8F0?t=35
TLDR: the frameless window "tucks in" under the trim of the roof/roof pillar and car has to drop the window slightly before it releases the latch.
In case of failure of any of the stuff necessary for that to happen (and there are a lot of things necessary for that to happen), there is an emergency exit lever.
Which shatters the window.
The lever which shatters the window looks pretty much like what any reasonable person would think is an oddly-placed door lever - right at the base of the interior door handle.
The mind boggles.
https://youtu.be/14ZYknJQ8F0?t=35
TLDR: the frameless window "tucks in" under the trim of the roof/roof pillar and car has to drop the window slightly before it releases the latch.
In case of failure of any of the stuff necessary for that to happen (and there are a lot of things necessary for that to happen), there is an emergency exit lever.
Which shatters the window.
The lever which shatters the window looks pretty much like what any reasonable person would think is an oddly-placed door lever - right at the base of the interior door handle.
The mind boggles.
For what it is worth: I don't own a Tesla but I've accidentally used that lever when I was in one. It did not shatter the window. It only triggered a warning on the display about not opening the door that way because it could cause damage.
"It only triggered a warning on the display about not opening the door that way because it could cause damage."
That makes me think worse of the design, not better, that it is so common but they chose to patch around it with a user nag instead of fixing the design.
That makes me think worse of the design, not better, that it is so common but they chose to patch around it with a user nag instead of fixing the design.
I used a Model 3 a few times and I could never figure out how to open the door in any other way. The first thing I think as a normal human is:
To open a door, you normally pull a latch, oh here it is.
Then the car yells at you but it spends more time telling you about the risks of what you’re doing wrong, instead it should immediately show a little animation of what I should be doing instead.
That or make the latch 2 step.First step is normal operation, if that fails then continue pulling and it forces the manual opening.
To open a door, you normally pull a latch, oh here it is.
Then the car yells at you but it spends more time telling you about the risks of what you’re doing wrong, instead it should immediately show a little animation of what I should be doing instead.
That or make the latch 2 step.First step is normal operation, if that fails then continue pulling and it forces the manual opening.
The AI predicts when you would like to get out and opens the door for you
/s
/s
The youtube comments suggest that a software update fixed this issue somehow. If someone could explain to me how that could possibly work that'd be nice. Surely that handle is connected directly to the door mechanism?
As long as you’re not heaving against the door as you open the latch the window will retract in time. If the battery went stone cold dead, you’d have to break the glass. But you would also have to do the same thing with every single other car with frameless windows
Do you? My Miata doesn’t have that problem, the window just rests against the rubber, doesn’t tuck under it.
However, I now understand why it is so noisy lol
Didn't know that! The cars I've owned with frameless windows, the glass tucks under piece of trim. Makes sense that the miata design is a little noisy!
That still sounds somewhat suboptimal, but a lot better than smashing the window 100% of the time you pull that lever for sure.
What about a car without frameless windows (IE, most cars) ?
Then none of this would be a problem. The issue is that frameless windows usually need electricity to operate
Maybe active power can prevent that physical switch from being fully pulled until the car drops the window a little bit, when it detects one starts pulling it. This would probably take less then a second.
Isn't the point of the lever that you need to be able to exit when the electrics have failed.
> The mind boggles.
This has been ~true of every frame-less window for decades; this isn't a new thing.
This has been ~true of every frame-less window for decades; this isn't a new thing.
So another interesting second level problem with this is that if the window motor or mechanism fails, you can't use the door at all. I have had window mechanisms fail and had to pop the cover off the door to get it back into place, but in this case you can't get the door open to get in there without breaking the window. So as far as I can tell if the window motor or mechanism fails, you will lose the window if you ever want to use the door again.
It's a much higher risk of damaging the trim than breaking the window; and not a guaranteed-damage either. A problem for sure, but not a 'you will lose the window if you ever want to use the door again' problem.
That said, until any other carmaker can get to the point where their EV has the tech and range, I won't buy anything else. They're just too much fun.