AWS has climbed on the AI-in-space bandwagon with more bad science(aws.amazon.com)
aws.amazon.com
AWS has climbed on the AI-in-space bandwagon with more bad science
https://aws.amazon.com/
2 comments
Correct link:
https://pages.awscloud.com/aws-reaction-ai-space-orbit.html
I don't know how this gets messed up every time I try to share it here.
https://pages.awscloud.com/aws-reaction-ai-space-orbit.html
I don't know how this gets messed up every time I try to share it here.
Most companies hyping this ignore the cooling problem: in space, you only have radiative cooling to rely on. Even though the temperature outside is absolute zero, radiative cooling is so inefficient that getting rid of heat is a major engineering requirement for every spacecraft.
But AWS is doubling down. They describe "natural cooling through radiators that dissipate heat into an environment hovering around minus 270 degrees" as a BENEFIT of space-based Ai datacenters.
Obviously, AWS engineers are smarter than this. And AWS is a solid business with a future, AI or no AI.
So why does AWS, a credible company with an established reputation, feel the need to echo the hype? Is there anyone left who doesn't know this is greenwashing?
[Reposted due to bad link in my original post]