AI doom warnings are getting louder. Are they realistic?(nature.com)
nature.com
AI doom warnings are getting louder. Are they realistic?
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01257-6?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20260423&utm_source=nature_etoc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CONR_41586_AWA1_GL_DTEC_054CI_TOC-260423
3 comments
I think we're far off from any sort of Skynet situation, but we're currently in the middle of an education catastrophe without any real answer.
My junior engineers hardly know how to debug or write code without LLMs doing 99% of the thinking. It would have been extremely tempting for me to use LLMs if they were available when I was in university. I really don't see how we can fix this without just banning homework and restricting LLM access in classrooms.
My junior engineers hardly know how to debug or write code without LLMs doing 99% of the thinking. It would have been extremely tempting for me to use LLMs if they were available when I was in university. I really don't see how we can fix this without just banning homework and restricting LLM access in classrooms.
Its only bad if the AI decides that it wants to scream and it has no mouth, otherwise, eh, what its gonna do? launch nukes? not a chance.
We can always pull the plug and idk, use all that compute gear to cure cancer or fold some cool proteins?
If the doom and/or hype is artificial then I think the problem will solve itself. The AI companies receiving tax dollars will last the longest and the rest will implode due to a lack of finding profitability. After the initial imploding any not used by the defense agencies will also likely implode like with some rhyme to the dot com crash. Like the dot com crash a handful of people will become wealthy and the rest will be left trying to pawn the grey market paperweights. On the plus side perhaps the net benefit is a lot of power generation equipment that can be merged into the public power utilities in a distributed manor, maybe.