Ask HN: Are there any developers prefer writing code manually?
6 comments
Hello, I'm the builder of Decispher. It captures the reasoning behind your team's decisions and serves it both ways: to your engineers, and to your AI agents before they write code.
One feature i would like to talk about: Branch Story (VS Code extension + npm). It captures the reasoning, diffs, and terminal output as work happens, then surfaces it at PR review time, so a reviewer knows why the code is the way it is instead of just reading a diff and hoping it's fine.
There's also "why is this line here": right-click any line in the editor, get the decision behind it.
One feature i would like to talk about: Branch Story (VS Code extension + npm). It captures the reasoning, diffs, and terminal output as work happens, then surfaces it at PR review time, so a reviewer knows why the code is the way it is instead of just reading a diff and hoping it's fine.
There's also "why is this line here": right-click any line in the editor, get the decision behind it.
Apart from the joy, I find it more useful, to have tools I know and can repair
do you write code yourself first then use ai to identify broken pieces?
Simply put, no :D
Like I review AI-composed code, but it doesn't necessarily mean I know what every piece of code is doing there.
Do you guys have the same issue?