HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

EDEdDNEdDYFaN

no profile record

comments

EDEdDNEdDYFaN
·قبل 12 شهرًا·discuss
clickbait title

it wasn't even a cursor specific extension it was a vscode one. completely misleading
EDEdDNEdDYFaN
·السنة الماضية·discuss
no
EDEdDNEdDYFaN
·السنة الماضية·discuss
To be fair to them - they've been doing it for 10 years without a problem!
EDEdDNEdDYFaN
·السنة الماضية·discuss
Isn't this a failure by the company to recognize free trial abuse sooner? and to not close the loophole immediately seems like even more of a weak behavior. Calling them out but not taking decisive action beyond claiming that they are acting immorally ultimately accomplishes nothing. Businesses are not beholden to your ideas about what is nice and fair, but whatever the rules and constraints are to your system. if you keep a practice like this that allows free trial abuse forever, why would they spend money?
EDEdDNEdDYFaN
·السنة الماضية·discuss
literally in the first few paragraphs of the linked article?
EDEdDNEdDYFaN
·السنة الماضية·discuss
cool shit
EDEdDNEdDYFaN
·السنة الماضية·discuss
extremely misleading headline implies that it just happened.
EDEdDNEdDYFaN
·السنة الماضية·discuss
lol perfect
EDEdDNEdDYFaN
·قبل سنتين·discuss
Very good read! love detailed explanations on the "bad" original code and steps taken toward improving it. a lot of it comes down to personal preference and the author did a good job at respecting what might have been an intentional design decision with their optimizations by making it all configurable
EDEdDNEdDYFaN
·قبل سنتين·discuss
thought this would be a mystery about a coder who disappeared that surfaced via pull request
EDEdDNEdDYFaN
·قبل سنتين·discuss
better question - does the changelog need to be checked in the first place?