Oh wow, I'm shocked that naive HackerNews twerps can't understand that art forgery is a key part of the money laundering operations that allows the wealthy to remain wealthy.
This site perpetually amazes me. There has to be a psychological effect for when a group of intelligent people discover a problem, and then intentionally propose overtly complex causes of death before they start ruling out basic points.
Even if this site knew that Islamic immigrants absolutely -HATE- dogs and thinks them evil, you would spend all your time ruling out the remote possibile cause of exotic bacteria in the atmosphere suddenly falling on Norway.
Correlate acid attacks to dog deaths. Be horrified. I'm going to call this psychological effect "HackerNews bias".
You'll have to review the rest of the leaked documents to see how algorithmic discrimination methodologies are tied into this. The preceding paragraphs are damning about intent and implication.
Not a single comment from anyone who has actually gone through the documents, like they don't reveal important AI security exploits caused by the "good intentions" of Google's morally superior engineers. Why is that?
Is HackerNews supposed to just assume Google is the paragon of moral supremacy? If so, can we get that written in the TOS so people know what to expect?
You're all so goddamned helpless.