HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

G0ther

no profile record

comments

G0ther
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
I am wondering, what does liberal freedoms mean when the public opinion i.e the measurement of what's good and what's bad is in the hands of the media be it conservative or liberal? also why would the US be interested in the stability of other countries really? because they're good people and I have to take your word for it? or?

supporting a dictator means no other voices / opinions come out in that country i.e ensuring it's all good there and no secret societies / enemy forces will ever ally in that place.

democracy is a liability for the developed nations unless the local public opinion is soaked into the western ideas.

there is no reason for the US or anyone to have good intentions for any "other" country and even when they have they have no right to intervene in the local politics and good intentions doesn't include supporting dictators

bringing order is not better for the people of that place it's only good for the safety of the US or whomever is supporting that dictator not to mention the enormous power the US holds that can literally in a year or so just assassinate the dictator and put a liberal one.

I think there were wikileaks about hijacking Iran's elections and putting Khomeini seamlessy that without that leak nobody's would have probably even knew about it.

assuming the US is interested in the wellbeing of other nations is really just naive and silly. the US itself has millions of people in the streets, drug addicts, homeless etc.. they could have started to help these people if they had any good intentions the money, the power, and the brainwashing machines - the media - all exist and can help these people.

but yet again, things don't work like that and never had been.

the capitalists don't care if a million or 2 or 4 are homeless. they know the US us under their complete control. other regions, might not be. so offering help, humanitarian aids or such. is only a way of changing the public opinion to look good. supporting a dictator on the other hand is a way to eliminate any possible opposition that might pop up.
G0ther
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
for the modern era? I would rather call it for the 90's, it would be more accurate description.

the graphics and level of realism c&c zero hour had is years ahead of this.
G0ther
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
ISIS, 9/11 and the invasions were planned you don't think people in high places are just some kids getting angry and acting on it, do you?

the dictators when you try to reasonate anything they're doing, you can see clearly they're working for someone, and you guess who might this one be.

because of course, destroying a whole country, violating human rights etc, isn't going to guarantee you a good long life for you and your family unless you have someone stronge enough to make you trust him tell you otherwise.

most dictators are against what the population believe and are enslaving people more or less. it's just the modern unseen slavery of the west.

By the way, USA made Al Qaueda and they were called the freedom fighters or something like that inb4.

What changed? the USSR ended and now they found another use for them, to stereotype the muslims and cause distress and push them off their religion to the new world-wide religion, humanity, ps. sugar-coated atheism.
G0ther
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
small but not the only thing and showing people how much power a small minority of people have, having a non evangelical religion, a lot of closed doors and supposed to be charities while committing unhuman actions and whatnot is quite fine though. nothing to worry about.
G0ther
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
Yeah Aljazeera does lack honesty indeed. but is it the point now? you know what's that called, it's called gaslighting. stop it.

yeah striking back is not civilized by did you consider their options?

maybe take a trip, live their, see what civilised options they have.

having enough nukes to wipe out the planet is civilised I assume?

killing children taking land committing war crimes, all these are civilised actions when taken against non-anglo people right? wiping out entire races to build democracy, pretty much, civilised. always has been.
G0ther
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
It is, and unreasonable too. I don't think having the life essentials and a good healthy life is dull or depressive unless you have been abused or something. but generally speaking no it's not bad. the all introverts depressive society, well, not everyone is happy around a lot of people. some are, some are not.

I think people loosing the meaning of their lives is their responsibility at the end of the day if they haven't been abused or just feeling dull, I have my purpose and I am striving to get to it with the depression left from unreasonable stuff that happened to me out of my own will.

I understand people need social connections, have them, make them, be the energetic relentless joyfull dude whom every girl would fall in love with, and every guy can rely on, just go out and meet people like you and make social connections. make communities yourself for god sake. if you have the essentials and you can't go homeless or so low, you have literally nothing to fear. just do something about it.
G0ther
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
I don't even know what will make him happy but he seems socially deprived and kind of trying to fulfill that by shifting the definition of happiness into being a fucking clown.

having all that and being "sad". I don't even know if antidepressants will work on him for god sake.

most people are dying in the rat race. some are being mentally destroyed and crushed into just getting up the ladder a fucking little bit, others are just suiciding to let go of the pain and suffering.

and they usually still laugh and try to be happy unless ofc they die, if having all these things isn't enough for him to be goddamn happy I don't know what will.
G0ther
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
where is the button "report this for being so stupid"? he mentions basically having a world class educational system, lowest corruption level and having the most stable economy in a (meh) accent. Okay, wanna strive and work for your dreams? feel the sweat of fighting and the pride of winning, the US is just also too good for that, move to a 3rd world country champ so you can have a social life.

tfw the dude has the shit everyone wishes for be he's like, nah I am not happy with it. okay, then go 3rd world and live there. enjoy the classical oldschool social life and be "happy". but please don't BS stupid things here because I did regret every second I spent reading this. If I had a static IP on my home router I would've begged you to ip-ban me so I won't come across such posts anymore.

they don't smile, as if the people in the fucking world are laughing day and night ffs. even when they do. you can see the damn depression, poverty, and the last drops of hope on their faces. you can see the ignorance, the feelings of being unsafe in your home country, the feeling of unjust, tribalism, dictatorships, resources being stolen, and fucking lots more.

then comes a random Finnish dude unhappy with all they have. what is supposed to make you happy? a fucking joke teller? a clown? a what? if having the most stable economy and free access to world class education and lowest level if corruption in the world isn't making you happy I am sure you'd need a therapist.