I don't think dividing opinions into conspiracist and not conspiracist is not a good epistemological basis.
Opinions can be judged on the facts they are based on facts and how they are based on logical arguments or not regardless of their conspiracistness.
I like to read the propaganda / state funded media of most major nation states of the world: Al Jazeera, TRT, CGTN, RT, BBC, CBC, PBS, etc.
Western "propaganda" is the most insidious and frankly insane. At least with other state media it is clear they are being advocates and their own population don't believe it and won't defend it in private conversations. But in the West we have a way to make people want to believe, it is very uncanny. If I see another "let's go to war for Afghan/Iranian/Syrian women" documentary from the CBC I will lose my mind.
The last time I heard a similar news from Google, it turned out they were solving a quantum phenomenon using a quantum phenomenon. It seems to be the same pattern here. Not to say it's not progress, but kind of feels like overhyped.
I never understood the fear of raw milk.
The best cheese are made with raw milk. I don't understand how it can't be safe when both the cow and the milk are
tested for disease and bad germs.
You should focus on the p2p part of code and object distribution. While nix is not perfect, people are not going to learn and adopt yet another package manager.
A distributed git object cache is what is really needed at the moment.
Lots of bad things were done in the name of empathy.
Colonialism is an example. Those "uncivilized" people "needed" European civilization and the effort was encourage as charity by the Church.
Bombings and other political violence are already illegal.
Are we going to classify every single variations of the political beliefs of every domestic terrorists even if they are shared by millions of others law abiding citizens?