How about introducing the following law:
If an employee is aware of a breach in their company systems and they use the said breach to enrich themselves - they are protected by law against all prosecution related to the said malicious action.
Isn't this Would you feel differently argument goes both ways?
Would you feel differently if you killed someone and the police found you only thanks to such dubious from privacy standpoint practice.
Coding jobs in Appalachia...wow I've heard it all.
The people living in these places are still semi-barbaric, they need a long civilizing process before they can cut it in the modern world, 2 months long boot-camps is definitely not going to do this.
It's a process that should start from childbirth.
It's a sad story that the East German Stasi and Communist party thugs avoided any type of punishment for their actions.
They should've been arrested, tortured, crippled, blinded and thrown on the streets to beg so the people that suffered their action can spit on them at will.
I never understood why the hiring process in IT is so tedious compared to let's say...construction work or driving?
Can you imagine that if on hiring a new truck driver the company was passing him trough 50 different routes on snow, ice and wet road. Or forcing a construction worker to build a house or something.
Yet if one of these two professions fucks it up - people might die, if a coder fucks up - he'll be fired and someone will remove 10 lines of code boo hooo.
I always found the grueling training regimes a race to the bottom.
Yes, the first one that introduces it has an edge and crushes everything for 3-4 years but then everyone else starts doing the same training so back to square one...with the difference that now you cannot head down to the bar every now and then as everyone and their grandmothers are working out and going to sleep at 10PM to have a chance winning a game.
I believe that the sportspeople should have gentlemen's agreements on the amount of training to put themselves through.