I'm more with Feynman: If you are able to do something, you understand it.
Natural language quite primitive when it comes to math/programming. Explanations are full of holes and gloss over important things.
It is funny that you mention "critical thinking". The vocabulary of a music critic/philosopher like Adorno is astounding and impressive.
This did not prevent Celibidache (a famous conductor) from calling Adorno the "biggest blowhard of the 20th century".
Intuition always rules in the discovery phase. Often others come and "explain" the works they did not create, because the creator is already busy doing his next thing.
Natural language quite primitive when it comes to math/programming. Explanations are full of holes and gloss over important things.
It is funny that you mention "critical thinking". The vocabulary of a music critic/philosopher like Adorno is astounding and impressive.
This did not prevent Celibidache (a famous conductor) from calling Adorno the "biggest blowhard of the 20th century".
Intuition always rules in the discovery phase. Often others come and "explain" the works they did not create, because the creator is already busy doing his next thing.