In the Spectre paper they note that while Chrome degrades the resolution of `performance.now()`, they were able to get a timer with sufficient resolution by using a Web Worker (thread) which repeatedly decrements a value in shared memory. As far as I know the EVM intentionally doesn't provide any concurrency because execution must be deterministic, and it seems doubtful that any kind of message-passing from outside the contract would be fast enough to provide the resolution needed.
However, the block-lattice cryptos like RaiBlocks that find a way to build in concurrency and shared memory might be different.
All these anti-Bolshevik treatises of late merely profit from the decay and ruin of Left-wing consciousness and culture that has taken place in the last century. The old Bolsheviks I once knew would have laughed at this "thesis". But who is around anymore to argue against it?
> Create a protocol or API spec on top of HTTPS or something else and use it.
This is basically what they've done with EDI/X12 over AS2, which was also mandated by HIPAA. The problem is that EDI is a pain to work with as a data format and hooking up to other trading partners can take weeks of coordination between IT teams (sending "implementation guidelines" back and forth). When EDI is the alternative it's not hard to see how the fax machine survives.
To get live data from ICE--the exchange that withdrew the request--I'm currently paying a broker $120/month.
By comparison, just about every crypto exchange currently offers push feeds and historical data for free. In most cases you don't even need to sign in.
In some sense this is a measure of the immaturity of crypto markets.
But it's also a reminder that with main institutional players moving in, the barriers to entry will go way up.
We'll probably start to see more brokers and vendors and more consolidation/buyouts of the crypto exchanges.
As a younger programmer, speaking honestly, it seems to me a significant part of the motivation behind Rust evangelism has to do with distinguishing yourself against older colleagues who have 20+ years of C systems programming experience. When you find yourself in a field that's supposed to be new and fast-moving, yet you're stuck in a junior position waiting for the old guys to retire, potentially for years, as if you're a journalist or academic or something, it's not hard to see why people look to develop a different skill set.
I had really bad sleep issues for years and what finally fixed it was not keeping my phone, laptop, or desktop anywhere near the bedroom. When I was younger I would fall asleep quite naturally no matter what I was doing or where. But now, even if I wasn't on them, having them near to hand would keep me up. They sort of sabotaged that in-between phase, just before you fall asleep.
If the question "How would you turn Twitter around?" is being asked in public with tons of people giving great answers, I'm sorry but you have a major leadership problem.
Does anyone know what's going on inside the White House in terms of who is working on these drafts and why the first differs so drastically from the second?
We have no reporting on this, only these "leaked" drafts.
The two drafts differ substantially. I don't see how the difference has much to do with the immigration order debacle. That certainly happened in the meanwhile but if anything it seems the second draft has changed to reflect the confirmation of new "agency heads".
The second is noticeably less ambitious too. It's written as if to have little to no effect whatsoever on the status quo.
The sort of facts-and-figures type of Democrat doesn't realize that politics is not the same thing as the technocratic administration of society.
Politics is not an optimization problem, it's not about finding the "optimal" state of affairs or whatever.
It's about hopes and dreams. It forms the horizon of the destiny people imagine for themselves, both individually and collectively.
It's also about virtue, morality, sacrifice, etc.
You may sneer but the masses do not.
This is why Democrats lose. They have no vision. What they offer right now is the same boring, stagnant, soul-less status quo, guided along by accurate reasoning about facts and figures.
People like Sam Altman are alarmed now that Trump has shown he is willing to meddle in labor markets and potentially impose protectionist labor policies. As Sam says, "This is not just a Muslim ban." Indeed not!
However, the block-lattice cryptos like RaiBlocks that find a way to build in concurrency and shared memory might be different.