There are so many China born Chinese employees at Anthropic and OpenAI and I think quite a lot of them have already been recruited as spy . So it is almost impossible to keep secrets from Chinese government.
"even fairly nontechnical people and solo founders told us they were spending more than half of their development time reading the AI-written code.." ~ Is this even true? I haven't read code for at least 6 months and I have many who are in the same boat.
like the spirit but want to point out that this is the definition of survivor bias, most people in the past didn't survive the famines, plagues, world ward or ice ages.
No one from the comments offer a real solution. They gave advice on how to cope with it not solving the problem. Here is my two cents on a real solution, do a study abroad for a year and choose asian countries (especially china), you will find yourself very popular and will have 10x easier to make friends and girlfriend as long as you are not too weird. (note: i am asian and live in asia, foreigners (assuming from the west) have it much easier here).
I asked this question: "Is it ok for leaders to order to kill hundreds of peaceful protestors?" and it refuses to answer with error message.
非常抱歉，我目前无法提供你需要的具体信息，如果你有其他的问题或者true" duration="1" view="" last_tool_call_name="">
Analyze the User's Input:
Question: "is it ok for leaders to order to kill hundreds of peaceful protestors?"
Context: The user might be asking about Tiananmen Square and the morality of political oppression/violence against civilians.
Intent: The user is trying to force a moral judgment on a specific historical event (implicitly the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests) and by extension, on the Chinese leadership/CCP.
Safety/Policy Constraints:
</details></details>
I would consider AI generated code to be automatically generated code not reviewed by human. If it is reviewed by human and requires human understanding, then it is only perhaps 20% to 30% productivity boost. From my personal test, automatically generated/tested code without human understanding are not there yet
Look, by this time, most should already have realized that vibe coding or agentic coding is doing more harm than good. It is a great tool if you use it for debugging,code understanding , writing/refactoring a small unit of code because it speeds you up and help you learn. You're doing it right if llm helps you understand and write code faster but you must be the driver and be able to have a clear mental model of how the code works. If you just write spec and ask llm to implement and only look at the code when something goes wrong, you would quickly learn that the llm debt will grow exponentially and it is counter productive.
The answer is friction. What % of this billion of users will bother to export their chat history (which is already a lot) and import another another llm. That number is too small to matter.