" it is not ACID the worst possible way" Vow what a great revelation.
"Cassandra is not row level consistent,[21] meaning that inserts and updates into the table that affect the same row that are processed at approximately the same time may affect the non-key columns in inconsistent ways. One update may affect one column while another affects the other, resulting in sets of values within the row that were never specified or intended."
This is not true. Cassandra is row level atomic but I guess it also depends on the version you use maybe. Can you talk about which version and provide a test that satisfies your assertion ?
"there are several things that needs to be tuning (like GC) that is not trivial to do". Do you know that Go's GC is way less advanced than Java GC as of today? This is admitted by Google's Go team lead.
I guess these days people can make up whatever they want without providing any valid tests that prove their assertions. It all comes down is either love & hate of a programming language or someone wants to put some fancy sounding tools in their resume!!
There is no such thing as equal pay for equal work. Two people within the same gender aren't paid equal in the Tech or any Professional services Industry forget across genders. More importantly, can someone define what equal work is? Same role/title doesn't translate to equal work. Every person has different capabilities even within in the same role and if it happens to be that a Woman outperforms than her peers then she should be paid equal or more and I wholeheartedly support that but the sad part with Women is that they never talk about such cases but instead Just hangs on to the phrase "Equal pay for Equal work" so they know if they make enough noise they can get equal pay but they never mention a word about equal work. And after working for 10 years in the Industry (which means I am young so don't think I am talking about some B.C era) and statistically speaking most of the time it had always been men who did tasks that are above and beyond from their regular duties.
Sheryl Sandberg Just spits out some none sense. She just got so Lucky to be the COO at FB in the first place. she thinks that if a company can control # years of experience, education level, and blah blah then that will be the deciding factor for Equal pay. I am like really? So two people with same amount of years of experience can perform the same way? Two people with the same education level are equally bright? What if one person went to college Doofus and another went to Stanford? I am sure going to better college doesn't automatically translate into a bright and efficient person for the company but it is an accomplishment one should acknowledge for their hard work. so in short, none of these factors can be controlled and the way most companies Judge pay depends on how well one performs in the Interview which is very much reasonable. If we do the Sheryl Sandberg way we actually don't need an HR department (which Btw, is lot of Women) we can just write a program to accept or reject applicants if is really that straight forward to control the factors she is talking about. I think it would be great if someone can actually make Sheryl Sandberg to code on a daily basis and deal with all the production issues.
I went to an Ivy League school and I worked as a TA for many Computer Science courses. I had worked with many students (both Men and Women) I had seen them getting Jobs at Google and FB and whenever they told me they got into Google or FB I used to ask my students so What questions did they ask you? Typically it is Algorithms most of the time as we all know and I can for sure say that the Algorithms questions asked to Men are way Significantly harder than Women. Now why is this not highlighted? Because companies like Google, FB wants to highlight that they hired Women. I bet my entire savings (I truly mean it) that if I go Google even today and pick random sample of 50 (25 Men Vs 25 Women) and randomly ask the Algorithm questions Men will significantly outperform Women because I know the level of difficulty questions asked for a Women and Men to get into Google. This is totally unfair. And I hate Men for giving up on these issues.
I am sure most companies know all of this. They want to pay equal because they don't want to deal with one more hassle. If I am a CEO of a large organization I will be all over the media asking Women define what Equal work is before they start talking about Equal Pay. And I would look at it case by case If a woman outperforms her peers then As a CEO I would actually pay more period.
Go is not anywhere near Java in terms of robustness or GC. This is something admitted by the Go team lead himself at google. Go has a long way to go. meanwhile Java is introducing some really smart features for Java 9. I don't see Go would ever replace Java but it may find its roof as a tool used for operations and deployment.
Do I need to take you seriously?! You don't have to play a "victim" role here You can just keep scratching someone's back. "Medium sized businesses" don't stop doing their business because of CockroachDB. They were able to do just fine with whatever systems/databases they were using prior to CockroachDB existence.
I spoke to good amount of people from their team. And they all sounded like bunch of people who are driven either by their inner bias or they just blindly follow their CEO (who I don't think is very capable) rather than going by technical evidence with an exception of one or two obviously. They also have people who moderate reviews and then just hype their product to get the attention so nothing in there is really honest. There are many other open source products that don't do any of this and accept their mistake as it is. In short, I wouldn't trust anything that comes of cockroachDB labs.
CockroachDB performance is just awful. Most of the members in its Team are arrogant just like the Go community. They just keep defending their statements without any evidence.
"Cassandra is not row level consistent,[21] meaning that inserts and updates into the table that affect the same row that are processed at approximately the same time may affect the non-key columns in inconsistent ways. One update may affect one column while another affects the other, resulting in sets of values within the row that were never specified or intended."
This is not true. Cassandra is row level atomic but I guess it also depends on the version you use maybe. Can you talk about which version and provide a test that satisfies your assertion ?
"there are several things that needs to be tuning (like GC) that is not trivial to do". Do you know that Go's GC is way less advanced than Java GC as of today? This is admitted by Google's Go team lead.
I guess these days people can make up whatever they want without providing any valid tests that prove their assertions. It all comes down is either love & hate of a programming language or someone wants to put some fancy sounding tools in their resume!!