HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

antonok

no profile record

comments

antonok
·قبل شهرين·discuss
It should be able to. Waterfox is using roughly the same integration and the maintainer has been seeing reports of YouTube issues, but cannot reproduce it. https://github.com/BrowserWorks/waterfox/issues/4182#issueco...
antonok
·قبل 5 أشهر·discuss
OpenCode has been great in my experience. I still get the best results using it with Anthropic's models, but some of the open weights ones are catching up (GLM 5 works reasonably well for me).
antonok
·قبل 5 أشهر·discuss
I had the same thought too. It's probably not too difficult to fine-tune a small model for it using the "introduce a random mutation and describe the issue" workflow from TFA
antonok
·قبل 5 أشهر·discuss
rillian was also instrumental in helping to integrate Rust into Chromium at Brave. I worked with him for a few years; since getting to know him, I started noticing his handle in the contributors list across a surprisingly diverse range of other open source projects. RIP, Ralph.
antonok
·قبل 5 أشهر·discuss
fwiw, LEDs with higher CRI will generally be less power efficient, so the premium category has a 3-way tradeoff between brightness, power, and color quality. It's common for high efficiency LED lightbulbs to be much worse at illuminating red objects.
antonok
·قبل 6 أشهر·discuss
You're probably thinking of Adblock Plus? Acceptable Ads is their program; EasyList has no such policy or ties.
antonok
·قبل 6 أشهر·discuss
FlatBuffers was definitely the majority of the improvements here!

On 64-bit systems, pointers themselves can really start to take up a lot of memory (especially if you multiply them across 100k+ adblock filters). Switching to array indices instead of pointers saves a lot of memory that's otherwise wasted when you don't need to address the entire possible memory space.
antonok
·قبل 8 أشهر·discuss
I opened an issue based on the discussion here and it didn't take much time or effort.

(It was one of those form-based issue templates that requires you to explicitly list out Steps to Reproduce, Expected behavior, Actual behavior, OS version, etc. which IMO causes slightly more friction for anyone who knows how to put together a good bug report, but I've also seen enough poorly-specified issues to know that it's necessary sometimes)
antonok
·قبل 8 أشهر·discuss
I've done it:

https://github.com/penpot/penpot/issues/7850

Thanks for sharing all the details about the issue, and shame on all the armchair critics :D
antonok
·قبل 9 أشهر·discuss
I'm using a non-standard port (above 10000). Otherwise, nothing special about my configuration. Perhaps 51820 is blocked?

It is admittedly quite slow/intermittent though; I wouldn't be surprised if that's the reason it didn't look like it was working for you.
antonok
·قبل 9 أشهر·discuss
Funnily enough, I'm on a British Airways flight right this moment. I'm only using a basic Wireguard tunnel after enabling the free messaging plan. I get the sense they didn't design the firewall to block everything comprehensively.
antonok
·قبل 9 أشهر·discuss
You could also look into running mobile Linux on top of libhybris - it's a proprietary compatibility layer, but some people use it to get support for mobile Linux runtimes on more recent devices.
antonok
·قبل 9 أشهر·discuss
If you want to find devices that still need hardware support under Linux, I highly recommend trying to get a mobile Linux distribution to work on an old smartphone or tablet.

postmarketOS in particular has a really good devices page [1] showing missing feature support at a glance, as well as guides for porting to new devices [2] and porting features from an outdated vendor-provided Linux fork to the upstream kernel [3].

[1] https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Devices [2] https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Porting_to_a_new_device [3] https://wiki.postmarketos.org/wiki/Mainlining
antonok
·السنة الماضية·discuss
https://brave.com/blog/brave-shields-manifest-v3/
antonok
·السنة الماضية·discuss
There is an Aggressive setting for Brave Shields, which you can set either per-site in the Shields menu from the URL bar, or globally in brave://settings/shields - that should take care of SERP ads and other first-party placements.
antonok
·السنة الماضية·discuss
Brave's adblocker supports the standard `$font` resource type modifier on adblock rules as well.
antonok
·السنة الماضية·discuss
As I see it, Brave is the only Chromium-based browser with a competitive Mv2-deprecation-resistant adblocker. If adblocking is important to you - and it is, to many people - then Brave literally is the only one worth considering. Not to mention it is open source, unlike most of the others.

(I work on Brave's adblocker, and FWIW the folks who work for Brave are very open about their affiliation when commenting about it online)
antonok
·السنة الماضية·discuss
uBlock Origin is available from brave://settings/extensions/v2; see https://brave.com/blog/brave-shields-manifest-v3/