Am I right in saying the conclusion of the experiment was: people who spend more time thinking about a problem before acting tend to find it more engaging and were therefore more successful?
I wonder if the quality of the art suffered within the context of the experiment because of the time constraint, even if in the long run those people tended to create better art.
Everyone should watch this to understand how far we've come in so little time.
I try to put myself in the mindset of someone at that time seeing a computer that takes up an entire wall, with the announcer in the background saying "Something like this could do your taxes one day".
Would I believe it? Then I think of the claims people are making today about AI, and try to take them more seriously.