> but not necessarily disallowing the account to be effectively anonymous
With the average opsec of chat sites, would you bet on "effectively"? Ironically Parler itself just had a leak.
Even if a company currently has good opsec, it can be acquired and go downhill (or turn evil).
In the current climate, this comment could (and would) be construed as implicit support of Parler, with all the consequences. The rich left loves "consequences", except for themselves.
With the average opsec of chat sites, would you bet on "effectively"? Ironically Parler itself just had a leak.
Even if a company currently has good opsec, it can be acquired and go downhill (or turn evil).
In the current climate, this comment could (and would) be construed as implicit support of Parler, with all the consequences. The rich left loves "consequences", except for themselves.