It's a matter of time until "differential privacy" gets cracked. The only private part to it is in the name. There is no need to collect this data but to sell it to another party.
Every input can be written in 1s and 0s and thus can be considered a number. Every output can be considered the same. There exists a line between every two numbers. That line can be represented by a simple one step linear regression. Now, every problem and algorithm is already an arbitrarily sized subset. If moved to the smallest possible subset, with essentially just the one input and one output, P=NP.
This is what irrational looks like. "just wrong" Um. Ok. Why? `limiting exploration of fair use` Unless you're one of those empirical people and like human experimentation, which is rather unethical when people's livelihoods are at stake, you can literally theorize that right now. Go ahead. Everybody's listening.
Well, while you continue to think about that and have no answer, we'll continue using laws that protect content creators.
Many of these opinions are nonsensical anti-capitalist drivel.
TPP is consistency and compromise and if there's a real better way, you better believe countries will adapt to it.