Simply put, there is less information in music. Copyright infringement cases have been won on as little as a handful of notes. So the likelihood of a copyrightable element from the underlying showing up in the model's output is that much higher. A single melody represents a similar portion of all possible melodies as does a color all possible colors and certainly less than the fraction represented by a single color palette. Yet you cannot copyright a color palette but you can a melody.
Copyright law regarding audio media is entire different beast than visual media; the case law and fair use technicalities do not always line up as simply as "if its legal on visual media it must also be legal on audio."
Google actually has three classes of shares. Class A common stock with normal voting rights, listed as GOOGL, Class B common stock which has 10x voting rights and over 90% of which is owned by Larry Page Sergey Brin or Eric Schmidt, and Class C capital stock with no voting rights traded under GOOG.
> FTX should not have been reachable by US citizens
Ostensibly this has already been the case. You can't even properly access ftx.com in the US. It just redirects you to the US exchange. FTX US is a distinct company from the international FTX exchange, at least according to Axios. If you still manage to get to ftx.com it gives you a banner saying its read-only, you aren't allowed to use it, and they wont let you.
FTX US is still allowing withdrawals at the moment, unlike FTX proper.
Gallium Arsenide. Semiconductor with certain nicer properties than silicon that allow it to switch faster and have a larger operating temperature at the cost being harder and more expensive to manufacture. That's a fairly big caveat, being a lot of the reason why silicon is so ubiquitous, relegating adoption of other semiconductors to more niche applications where their more optimal properties are a necessity.