Psychic abilities are real, science does not understand consciousness.
Another article where science clearly using it's "science" has no science to prove. Because there is no science to an unknown field, a field that mainstream science does not touch.
It's not hard to create crypto currency, stop reporting this as news. These people are notoriously shady and hard to identify. Try my new magic money, it's going to be great. No seriously read this message outloud: "fuck you"
I have an obsession with proper URL formatting, and I appreciate when my browser also takes this in to consideration. I always find the site loads quicker when I use www. and I will continue typing URLs in this way as I have become used to it for over a decade.
The valid point this article makes is that there is not enough education or knowledge on this subject. Schools don't teach this, this is why there is cases of people typing URLs in to search engines.
Computer classes apparently need to have a WEB 101 or something, because this lack of understanding of something so useful and basic is absurd.
I just wish these web readers implemented control+f find feature, because this is the most useful thing for me and a lot of people. To be able to search entire books for a string of text is so useful.
I think a big point the author is missing is branding.
If you use medium you gain some short-term cred, but in the long term you are missing out by being "in" with a group.
Social networks, any large scale networks stagnate creativity. If you are your own free entity I respect that a lot more. I always appreciate well done websites and I think mobile is passé. It's time to reinvent the web and 4K screens are very exciting tech for me personally.
Bitcoin is inherently malicious. It is deceptive in that it promotes the illusion of power through manipulating bitcoin. It is very easy, for certain people to manipulate.
China for example, and all of the miners the more people that are involved the higher you go with Bitcoin the more corrupt it becomes. I find it highly centralized, and in the control of a very select few. Even the Winklevoss twins holdings is not the same as the miners and their groupthink.
Failed experiment, yes. But now you have an 8000 lb monster in the room. Does this require regulation or is the monster going to destroy itself?
This article literally states there is not two sides of every debate. This is typical BBC propaganda if I have ever read it. To be honest, we all know smokers who have lived past 80 and in to their 90s. The mystery of smokers who live long is astounding to me, but how dare I speak a lie of such dark deceit on the inter webs?
I am smoking a pack a day, loving life, this article and everyone who believes smoking is bad is an idiot. You didn't do your own research, you just believed whatever the fuck they told you.
BTC is funny, it is revolutionary, but it does not really have anything to offer over insured money in a real bank. Bitcoin, if it ever wants to have the every-man invest in this "currency" it needs to offer some sort of insurance, which usually requires identity. Digital cash that is anonymous can not offer this, so it is inherently flawed. To use it, quite simply puts yourself at risk.
So really the banks are correct in their assesment, the real value quite obviously is indeed in the blockchain technology.
Psychic abilities are real, science does not understand consciousness.
Another article where science clearly using it's "science" has no science to prove. Because there is no science to an unknown field, a field that mainstream science does not touch.