Sqlite's limitations have nothing to do with PHP. But you're correct that it's not intended for use as a multi user database. The limitation is in concurrent writes. If your app is read-oriented, then there is not a problem.
However, I'd personally always use postgres in this case, myself.
This article has the typical dichotomy of a piece discussing the medical aspect of addiction: after waxing on for paragraphs about the medical nature of addiction, and how the rats she studies are helpless to avoid relapse, it then ends on a moral note, stating that "the choice [to maintain sobriety] is his".
Well, if addiction is in fact a medical problem, then the choice is not entirely his, is it?
For people like the father, I'd strongly recommend getting on and staying on methadone. It's not easy, but it's a real of a lot better than going to prison and destroying one's family.
> If this is about to happen, is only going to be as a reaction to the leftist policy in recent years - similar of Trump/Brexit.
Can't we encourage people to react toward freedom and liberty? Toward less government control over our lives, and not toward some authoritarian charismatic who promises to save us all? I agree things have sucked for lots of Europeans, but let's not cut off our nose to spite our face, eh?
Since this seems to be the current political front-page thread, I'm going to get some things off my chest as a libertarian who voted straight big "L" libertarian ticket with the exception of Clinton as president (which I did with great distaste and only to vote against Trump).
All of you who are raging against the censorship and unfair power of the PC and SJW movement have an absolutely legitimate complaint. I too have been prejudged and attacked by SJWs who made incorrect assumptions about me based solely on my skin color and gender. THAT SAID, do you realize what you've done by voting into power an authoritarian reality TV star with a history of chronic bankruptcy, loose business ethics (habitually stiffing contractors), and erratic behavior?
I'm sure you're satisfied that the SJWs are suffering now, but have you internalized the gravity of having Donald Trump in an executive office that has grown immensely powerful after the Bush and Obama administrations and 9/11?
Best case scenario is that Trump does a Nixon and uses our security apparatus to crack down on his enemies, such as the media and "traitor" Republicans. I think this is very likely. Worst case, and I say this honestly and with good faith: I can only hope we'll get to the end of these 4 years without seeing Russia occupy one or more of the Baltic republics and/or significant parts of Europe fall to far-right authoritarian/strongman parties, probably accompanied by significant violence.
What would happen then? Are you all prepared to fight in WW III just to spite a bunch of whiny college kids?
You all assume that everyone who opposes Trump is a "lib" or "SJW" or "Democrat". I don't give a rat's ass about any of those. The end of political correctness and social justice crusading would delight me, and I'd be very happy to see both major parties dissolve and a genuine multiparty system spring up in their place (yeah, I know, ain't gonna happen).
Finally, if you're a libertarian and voted for Trump, and you thought the Bush and Obama admins were bad (and they were!), just wait. Things are going to get crazy now. Any President-elect who is Tweeting 3 a.m. rants at a specific newspaper is not going to be a president who respects the 1st Amendment (and for the record, I'm a strong supporter all all the amendments, including the 2nd). Go look at what his base has been calling for on Breibart and r/The_Donald: shutting down unfavorable media outlets, hanging Soros (a US Citizen!) for treason without trial. Seriously, go check out r/The_Donald and tell me what kind of vibe you get.
How are they going to round up 3 million illegals? Random ID checks? Profiling?
I think a lot of people voted out of frustration (understandable), but gave the extraordinary power of the US Presidency to quite possibly a more unstable personality than Nixon (not understandable, and totally irrational).
There's a possible ugly 5th heartbreaker: "we love your topic and experience but you look too old and unhip for our hip frontend conference".
I've been rejected for conferences where every speaker that was accepted looked well under 30. At the least, no one had grey hair.
It's frustrating to me because the very same conferences are highly vocal about seeking diversity, and do usually end up with some gender diversity (although non-Asian/non-White speakers are almost always poorly represented). But there's no age diversity: everyone on stage is between 20-30, or else goes to a plastic surgeon and dresses to look that age.
However, I'd personally always use postgres in this case, myself.