I'd suggest our frames of reference are too far apart.
Your statements indicate that you place the entire onus of responsibility on end users. I hold some fault toward users, but include fault in the providers.
Generally, the world isn't black and white.
Why do you believe users deserve all of the responsibility? What about in countries where the entirety of information in and out is filtered?
This style of propoganda may be a type of coerced information.
These are also private entities. They can legally and morally censor without recourse.
All in all, I find the triviliation of those possibilities distrubing.
> Healthy discourse cannot occur in the dark. How can I discuss an article that I don't know even exists?
Hyper targeted informational warfare inflames tribalism. You suggest we "mingle more" about 20 miles away at the park. It might be "healthy", but no one will give a crap if the park is empty.
Blaming individuals for group manipulation is not the answer.
MIT licensed.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/insta...