Well the reasons for a choice do matter, don’t they? They matter in today’s law in many places.
Is aborting because of an LLM „likelihood“ of some genetic issue (that might lead or not lead to an short or unhappy life) the same as aborting after rape for you?
Biggest problem in fact is that people take genetic markers as deterministic and assume the worst outcome. Lots of false abortions happen. That does not happen with rape.
Is there such choice? Today parents are not doing that choice but choosing to stop the life of the kid with Down-Syndrome. So I’m not sure they are receiving „all the respect“ today - are they?
This is an anecdotal example, isn’t it? What do people today abort for, after genetic diagnosis? Down-Syndrome and other markers with highly random and non-fatal outcomes.
It reads like a specific genome would lead to deterministic outcomes. It does not. Life is messy.
Most Down Syndrome people have happy lives, some can even live alone and have an independent daily live.
Life expectancy is up to 60 years.
Yet in Iceland „Democratization“ of genetic diagnosis lead to basically 0% Down Syndrome kids (births).
Where does this stop? What with someone of a genetic indication of aggressive cancer- life expectancy 55? Abort?
The same (detectable) genetic mutation leads to vastly different lives. This is correlation. Nobody sees the many undiagnosed broken genomes with no visible symptoms that would be aborted with more such businesses like this.
Is this really relevant news? Please share more bug reports from popular services and tools. Feels a tiny bit biased. My CC is just fine since at least three weeks.
To some degree sure, is it about the number tokens you can max out?
I’m pretty happy knowing that it supports my development workflow for a week. Recent features like the Code Desktop built in browser, Cowork with Claude in Chrome and remote control matter to me way more than the number of tokens. But that’s me.
Depends on their targeted ICP also, which they are free to define. Is it those users maxing out tokens for the buck? I have the feeling there’s even better alternatives on the market right now.
At least as an EU user I was also able to export ALL my data, audio files images etc in one zip. Took exactly (on the minute) 24 hours for the download link to arrive but hey.
This way you can have Claude distill the memory as you wish.
Not sure I do, but to try, this is calling for a culture of science, education and differentiation, which I thought this is. Against black and white simplifications that don’t enlighten anyone but foster extremes.
Not all JavaScript code is bad, nor is all AI-generated code bad (neither good).
We see this black and white simplification all over the place, no trade offs desired anymore. We pick a bad characteristic about a (new) habit product food or technology and that’s enough to render the whole thing inferior.
There is good tries with nutrition transparency in some EU countries, as an example for education around food.
if people can and want to understand it, they can make good choices.
Maybe the US isn’t ready or wishing for such level of education and freedom. Even some EU countries are not.
Totally there’s correlation, and to some extent causality. And it’s mostly right. But it’s also wrong. You can pick healthy packaged food in the supermarket. Durability doesn’t require additives in many cases.
Mainly, it will be very hard to change the cooking habits of people in this sense. Chopping your own vegetables is much harder than buying the right (processed) food that doesn’t change anything else about your habits. It sounds super “free” - I doubt it will have large scale impact on the US average diet. Better regulate your food.
To me it seems the point is “processed” == bad. Isn’t it? And NOVA seems to be the gold standard for what’s “processed”.
Of course there’s better things as whole grain bread in plastic foil (whole grain bread freshly made) or infant formula (breastfeeding). But they are more healthy than other things that rank better in NOVA.
Is aborting because of an LLM „likelihood“ of some genetic issue (that might lead or not lead to an short or unhappy life) the same as aborting after rape for you?
Biggest problem in fact is that people take genetic markers as deterministic and assume the worst outcome. Lots of false abortions happen. That does not happen with rape.