HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

gaff33

no profile record

comments

gaff33
·السنة الماضية·discuss
Everyone knows 'goto' is bad, so a language like this needs 'comefrom'
gaff33
·قبل 3 سنوات·discuss
Only 6 days? That's impressive!
gaff33
·قبل 3 سنوات·discuss
The problem is that low density urban areas are subsidsed by high densisty urban areas: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IsMeKl-Sv0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVUeqxXwCA0 etc

They are also terrible for the planet.
gaff33
·قبل 4 سنوات·discuss
Does anyone actually like using JIRA? Or Confluence? Or any of the Atlassian products?
gaff33
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
I see where you're coming from. From where you sit Jupyter is a language agnostic tool and so in. But the fact that there's dozens of solutions in this space is surely a problem?

I'd have thought there would be some things you could strongly encourage:

1. Come up with some standard format where the code and the data live in separate files.

2. Come up with some standard format where you can take load a regular .py script as a cell based notebook using metadata comments (and save it again).

If these came out of the box it would solve most of the issues.
gaff33
·قبل 5 سنوات·discuss
I work with a bunch of 'data scientists' / 'strategists' and the like who love their notebooks but it's a pain to convert their code into an application!

In particular:

* Notebooks store code and data together, which is very messy if you want to look at [only] code history in git. * It's hard to turn a notebook into an assertive test. * Converting a notebook function into a python module basically involves cutting and pasting from the notebook into a .py file.

These must be common issues for anyone working in this area. Are there any guides on best practices for bridging from notebooks to applications?

Ideally I'd want to build a python application that's managed via git, but some modules / functions are lifted exactly from notebooks.