It's like if only we put more resources towards potential societal altering technologies like these instead of [insert random SAAS app]. Maybe tech investors aren't very comfortable with projects outside their domain knowledge and expect an quick return. Quaise last financing round was something like $20M...
No, you don't simply "move to a new coin". ETH is currently a 420B market cap and rewards GPU miners something on the order of 13,000 ETH a day conservatively (without fees). That's nearly 50m dollars a day or 1.5B dollars a month!
The only "other coins" available to be mined with GPUs are tiny. Ethereum classic has only a 8B market cap, Ravencoin with 1B, then many sub 1B coins.
This year with the labor shortage has shown we need more "basic" employees getting a livable wage than a country full of college educated students chasing white collar positions
I wonder much of this is caused by recent installments of agricultural field drainage tile?
Land price increases allow for more farmers to afford to "improve" their farmland by adding underground pipes that quickly wick standing water away into nearby creeks and rivers. What used to be evaporated or absorbed into soils is dumping straight into waterways.
What about 0 percent interest rates? How much environmentally damaging malinvestment across the globe has been caused by risk free money?
Think of how carbon intensive the concrete, steel, manufacturing, power generation industry are. Not to mention the population boom beyond our earths carrying capacity needed to perpetuate our ever increasing monetary scheme requiring never ending growth where deflation can never exist.
No one is paying bills right now due to COVID relief. Q4 alone saw $32B of missed student loan, $7B in missed rent and $14B of missed mortgage payments. Pent up roaring 20's demand and hyperinflation?
Central banks are trying to prop up the deflationary structural changes happening in the broader world economies due to aging demographics and technology reducing the value of human labor.
The end result is an enormous asset bubble as their only solution is to print money to prevent any actual deflation from happening as that would implode the financial system.
Give me rock solid and cheaper 4G before jumping the gun to 5G.
How will going from say 40mbps to 250mbps+ on a phone help me in any way over the next 2 years? For video, the limits of a phone display cap the max bitrate below 5G's speed. 1080p at 60fps is around 16mbps.
Your logic is flawed in that shares aren't simply "destroyed" they have to be bought back on the open market at an agreed upon price from a willing seller. The sellers of the shares may not want to sell and will therefore require more than the perfect price 𐤃X that accounts for adjustment of market cap based on reduction in shares.
In theory if no one wants to sell shares of Apple during a buyback the share price will head towards infinity. There's always a price though that someone will let go of a share at.
Sure in a perfect world you decide to sell 1 share to Apple. The share price increases to account to for the lost share and market cap stays same.
In reality, enormous swaths of shares are held by index tracking funds and everyday investors who don’t sell their shares into buybacks. In this case the market price based off supply/demand must rise in order to find someone who will let go of a share so Apple can buy it.
Don't forget the non-emotional constant demand for Apple shares caused by stock buybacks combined with a 7% weight in the S&P 500. Every new dollar invested in an index tracking ETF/mutual fund needs to buy 7c worth of Apple stock from someone.
It's a huge supply/demand problem. At what price will someone forego Apple shares? What happens when Apple is 10%, 15% etc of the S&P 500 index? Where will these shares to sell come from? At this point, why would anyone holding Apple shares outright sell?
This demand may only lead to a self reinforcing feedback loop where: a greater market cap (3T?) -> higher index weight (10+%) -> greater buying pressure -> more shares locked up in index funds (not available for sale) -> repeat
This is explains why there has been increasingly volatile movements in Apple shares. This lack of share liquidity works both directions: buying and selling. Not enough active investors are available to step in when passive investors (who now make up an enormous portion of capital markets) decide to start selling index tracking funds in bulk.
Speaking of splits, I love how Apple’s stock split justification is:
“We want Apple stock to be more accessible to a broader base of investors.”
https://investor.apple.com/faq/default.aspx
Yet it’s one of the top stocks held on Robinhood (#3 at 700,000 users)