I was not implying that that feeling was good or advocating for it. Just that that feeling appears, even if misguided, and we need to understand it to understand self-destruction loops
Indeed, I have just realized that the main problem of the US healthcare system is that their inhabitants cannot even imagine that anything better even exists.
Healthcare is much more than being operated or receiving some treatment for a rare condition, both things that are very much researched and done outside the US both privately and with public money. Healthcare is also about allowing people with health problems to live with dignity and allow then to function in society. To care for the weak and not only to restore productivity of a broken cog. Healthcare is about a strong first line of care that prevent conditions to get worse and irreparable. Many countries with a thousand or less of US's GDP can teach a lesson or two on that. In any case, most countries are slowly copying many aspects of US healthcare, I guess it must be indeed be better, or perhaps more profitable.
I would even say that any person of any country with enough financial resources could afford and get the best treatment in whatever country of the world would happen to be offered.
I think in most countries in Europe the national id number is enough to link taxes to specific people (identity card numbers are to most effects public), even though for official international documents you need to provide the accepted Tax Identification Number (TIN) which you can find in https://www.oecd.org/tax/automatic-exchange/crs-implementati..., but more as a convenience than anything else.
That keeping secret your SSN is a thing is something that mostly affects the US.
You are choosing to play with words instead of trying to understand what it meant. It can also be that you are trying to make a point of the broadness and the impossibility of providing an exhaustive definition. If we tried, we would do nothing else, for anything: is freedom actually freedom if I am not allowed to harm others gratuitously?
For the law, the slave and the dictator both have dignity, and lower-rank laws will go into detail into what that entails up to the point the judicial system would need to establish if a certain act violates the dignity of a human or not: e.g., "can we kill a dictator nude in a public place and exhibit their remains at the entrance of the presidential palace?" Does it violate their dignity (even if we consider undeserved?)?
They do. I have seen news in Europe where they cannot reproduce the original excerpt (reading aloud instead) of some communication because of copyright laws and the original excerpt belonged to a competing media corporation that had won previous such cases in court.
In fact, I wanted to say that such concepts in laws that direct how other laws are made need be necessarily broad. If you think of it: freedom, dignity, citizenship, and so on, are not to be interpreted in absolute terms according to some official definition. The motivation for the law is fundamental, and concepts get narrowed down in laws of lower rank until the point at which they cannot be listed case by case, then interpretation by the
judicial system enters into account, e.g., is the insult "f*g idiot" within the protected freedom of speech?
I was talking of a bracket of poverty you only need 300km south of Sweden to experience. That is, still, not real poverty. And I mean countries with a good safety net and infrastructure even if not as good as in Sweden
What? When you make an appointment for something you need to have done you cannot control the time you are going to be given for the appointment... It is unavoidable, and even more, the lower in the food chain you are the less control you have over it: you cannot call a more expensive but more convenient service, you cannot choose to be diagnosed by a private doctor instead of accepting the time given by the subsidized service, and so on, moving out is not possible because you can't pay to move your stuff. Poverty traps you in ways you will only understand once you experience it.
If Europeans had some power on the immigration decisions of the US it would be stupid to make it worse for others when you could just accept it to be worse only for yourself.
On the other hand, a lot of people that have never experienced something do not even realize that that problem even exists or is real. Maybe experiencing a little bit of difficulty will enrich the vision of those.
Still, I think the point should be that with this pre-approvals you have end up with an easier immigration process and less worries for both sides (less time at immigration and not being turned down in the last moment).
C++ programmers where selectively implementing borrow checkers at runtime decades ago (see library omnetpp as an example). Moving those borrow checkers to compile time with templating is possible (but people did not do it because the borrow checking could be disabled after testing and no overhead would be paid neither at runtime nor compile time). That Rust implements borrow checking as pillar of the language I think it is great.
Not still a good analogy, but radiation can be seen as a consequence of vacuum not being empty from the perspective of an electric field (it has a very low permittivity, but it is not zero, so it is not empty of that property) even though it is empty of mass. If your water pipes are a bit porous and the medium on which your water pipes are was not air, but a very dense fluid, radiation emanating from the porous pipes would travel at the speed of sound through the medium, and could be detected without particles of water actually travelling through the dense fluid that constitutes the medium where your hydraulic circuit is submerged.
Those two sentences that you wrote are precisely the hydraulic analogy. If it weren't, instead of electrons it would be charge (that can be positive or negative), or field strength (if you explain the transitory period of a capacitor or non-DC), and voltage would become not the force, but a number that applies to conservative fields that allows to calculate the capacity to do work relative to another such number...
Another reason to have a limit well below the computer's memory capacity is that one could find ill-formed documents in the wild, e.g., an unclosed quotation mark, causing the "rest' of a potentially large file to be read as a key, which can quickly snowball (imagine if you need to store the keys in a database, in a log, if your algorithms need to copy the keys, etc.)